Take some time and look ever a new 94s. They are fantastic.
I'll take your word for it & leave it at that....
------------------
NAA.
Take some time and look ever a new 94s. They are fantastic.
Nice guns, but not $1000+ nice guns, over the Pre-64 in excellent condition... and somehow, they lack the soul of the original... I own both and only get the "feels" (as the kids say... apparently), with the Pre-64.
Wanting to add a lever gun to my collection, is the Winchester 94 (at $1900 at Cabela's) really worth like almost twice much as a Marlin? The Marlins come in pistol calibres which seem like cheaper ammo. What do you all have, are you pleased with your Marlin or Winchester?
Once one separates the romance from the item, the pre 64 Winchester 94 is revealed to be just another gun. Winchester branding was so good it still sticks 120 years later.

I briefly owned a Winchester 94AE (angled eject) in 44 Magnum and it was a stoppage machine.
Almost half the rounds would catch on the casing when going to feed, and I couldn't stand it.
Your results may vary, but after this experience and the terrible 22LR Winchester ammo, I am done with the brand.
You must not have owned and used one.
I briefly owned a Winchester 94AE (angled eject) in 44 Magnum and it was a stoppage machine.
Almost half the rounds would catch on the casing when going to feed, and I couldn't stand it.
Your results may vary, but after this experience and the terrible 22LR Winchester ammo, I am done with the brand.
Owned several. Took them hunting. They're just a gun.
I had the same thing with a 44 Trapper fancy piece of junk .




























