WK180c Practical Review with Pics and Video

Travis Bickle

CGN Ultra frequent flyer
Rating - 100%
179   0   1
Took a chance on a second hand new WK180c off the EE.
I'll try and keep this brief and to the point.
The rifle is well built for what it is. It's well machined and it's solid. Doesn't feel flimsy or cheap.

Pros:
- Light weight
- Simple design. Very few parts.
- Affordable
- Decently accurate for anyone who shoots to hit things not measuring holes with calipers.
- Ambi charging handle selection.
- AR15 compatible barrel, trigger assy (aside from safety selector), pistol grips (any CAN fit with modification)
- Lighter weight profile barrel instead of a massive heavy barrel that does nothing to make it any more accurate (thank Christ they got this concept right...)

Cons:
- AR15 factory stock supplied with rifle (personal preference thing, I HATE collapsing stocks. Give me a fixed or side folder any day)
- A2 AR15 pistol grip is at a very wonky angle to the geometry of the receiver and the trigger. I know they were trying to save costs at every corner and I applaud them but it's just an observation. Get an MOE Slim and a dremel and fix the problem!
- Quality Control: my chamber was WAY too tight. Hard time chambering and rough extraction as evidenced by bolt not closing once case was 2/3 into the chamber, required physical force. If case was extracted without firing, the hard marring on the base of the case was evidence of excessively tight chamber.
Badly assembled/machined barrel extension to inner receiver fit. Created a "Non M4 style barrel in an M4 upper receiver" problem (google it) Projos jamming up on the edge of the feed ramp.
Warranty fixed the chamber by reaming it and they machined the feed ramps back to sit flush with the receiver. Rifle would still NOT cycle and feed with any STANAG mags including attempts with LAR15 mags, Colt 5/20 Pinned, Norinco 5/30, NATO surplus 5/30. I have zero doubt now that there is too much slop in the machining of the magwell on this rifle causing the front of the mags to "dive" down as the bolt attempts to feed a round. Plastic HERA and MFT 10 rounders now work flawlessly though.....I'm on the fence as to whether this is good enough for me but I digress.
- Factory trigger is one of the worst I've ever used and I'm no fancy equipment snob by any means. I swapped it for a cheap S and W assembly and it's night and difference for the better. The hammer spring was about 3 times as stiff as any of my AR15's. Probably was not aiding in allowing the bolt to travel freely rearward in the receiver either with the excessive pressure required to #### it back.

Anyhow, it handles like a dream. Points easy, controls are excellent.

The rifle is stock aside from the trigger assembly, the MOE Slim grip I modified to fit it and the MOE fixed carbine stock to replace the M4 it came with. Sights are standard Magpul MBUS flip ups. I chose the MOE fixed carbine specifically because it's stumpy and short. The big adapter they put on the ass end to make it fit an AR15 buffer tube puts any other stock LOP stretched WAY out.

sblteu.jpg


swtoc7.jpg


vpcmjs.jpg


The targets were my 18" AR500 steel gong and excellent upside down triangle for consistent POA shooting irons. Ammo is 62gr Federal XM855 bulk.
Temperature was a frigid -23 C with the wind today!

hx4xmo.jpg


29ncvo7.jpg


Here is the first 10 shot group just shooting prone in the snow off my Makita range bag. Gong and target at 100 meters known distance.

6jf60g.jpg


15i5jia.jpg


I shot 3 more 10 round groups. My eyes get tired. They were all about the same. The first was the best but only by a flyer here or there.

Here's a video of 10 rounds standing shooting the 18" gong at 100 meters:

[youtube]6j4ZHRTtgfk[/youtube]

9 out of 10 isn't bad!
So it can shoot. It's more accurate than any rack grade AR15 I've ever shot and even some "top shelf" ones that cost 2 to 2.5 times the price of this gun.
That being said the quality control issues still gnaw at me with the literal no go on STANAG mags still even after warranty work...

I'm also not a fan of unreliable guns.
So I decided to test out something that a lot of people were griping about early on. Primarily the receiver being too open to dirt, snow etc getting in and jamming the rifle up.
Say you were out in the bush and dropped her in the snow accidental and....kicked it around a bit too for the f**k of it lol:

[youtube]25E596PXZrs[/youtube]

So what I can tell anyone interested in the reliability aspect of the rifle is this; don't drop it in the snow. And if you do for whatever reason make sure you take it apart and clean out the trigger assy.
The rifle did fire and cycle even with snow up in every orifice HOWEVER the stoppages it did have were not from cycling. The snow getting into the receiver easily finds its way into the tight trigger group pocket and will block up the hammer sear and disconnect creating a potentially very dangerous barely caught hammer that could slip easily with the slightest bump after attempting to pull the trigger.
The armchair commando's were surprisingly correct on this one! Being right handed I'd be all for closing the right side of the receiver aside from the ejection port and having a simple flip cover to seal the action for carry etc and just have it set left side charging handle......That being said; I would not put my life in the trust of the WK180c if I had to crawl prone through sand dunes or arctic tundra to assault beer cans on a fence post...that's what the SKS is for Comrade!
Just don't drop the fun gun in the snow and kick it around and you should be good to go!

Just for fun, I cleared the trigger assy of snow and ice and dropped it again then fired 10 rounds standing at the 18" plate at 100 meters:

[youtube]h-3XSC3wOMo[/youtube]

No stoppages this time at all but I did not kick it around after I dropped it into the deep snow. Just dropped and picked up.

Accuracy 5 out of 5: It's a lowest quality possible material and parts semi auto piston gun and it shoots as good as most $2K AR15's any day all day. I'm going to file the front post thinner on my front iron and tighten up the POA even more.
Ergonomics 3 out of 5: The wonky angle of the A2 pistol grip has to be addressed and the collapsing stock is junk, swap it for any MOE plastic piece of overpriced s**t and grind it to fit and it will fix it very well, huge improvement. I think they need to ditch the big chunky adapter on the ass just to make it fit AR15 parts and design a simple, cheap and reliable side folding fixed stock. Left/right hand charging handle is brilliant! (as long as you aren't taking it with you on winter warfare) Ambi safety selector from factory.
Reliability 2 out of 5: This may be unfair as I have only intimately held and used this one example but the over tight chamber, terrible feed ramp to receiver assembly design and the fact that I still can't run STANAG metal mags period even AFTER the warranty work, is still eating at me hard.
Price 4 out 5: Aside from the issues with my individual rifle, if there are people out there with theirs that are running STANAG metal mags as well as mine runs plastic Hera/MFT ones then just over $1K for this rifle still makes it the best NR black rifle going in the country right now IMHO.

Can anyone out there with one let me know how theirs is doing with any FMJ projectile ammo and STANAG metal mags please? Am I the only one experiencing this issue? Mags dive forward and projectile tip jams into middle of feed ramp, the bolt pushing from the rear, the tip on the ramp and the mag tilting forward frozen up like this. Even forcing the bolt by hand won't feed it.
 
Last edited:
Excellent review!


Can anyone out there with one let me know how theirs is doing with any FMJ projectile ammo and STANAG metal mags please? Am I the only one experiencing this issue? Mags dive forward and projectile tip jams into the feed ramp, the bolt pushing from the rear, the tip on the ramp and the mag tilting forward frozen up like this. Even forcing the bolt by hand won't feed it.


The problem is the mag sits too low in the receiver compared to other AR-15s.
 
No, I sold both of them after a couple days.

Faaack....
Then both yours had the exact same issue Sir?

I'm really wondering if it's a common thing and noone is talking about it. It's driving me nuts. If there is no fix then I won't be keeping it. I didn't buy a "STANAG" magazine rifle that takes proprietary type mags....
I'm torn because I love the rifle aside from that but it's still driving me crazy.
 
Faaack....
Then both yours had the exact same issue Sir?

I'm really wondering if it's a common thing and noone is talking about it. It's driving me nuts. If there is no fix then I won't be keeping it. I didn't buy a "STANAG" magazine rifle that takes proprietary type mags....
I'm torn because I love the rifle aside from that but it's still driving me crazy.

I tried only one and I sold both of them when I found out all the issues. I pointed it out in July and Wolverine Supplies decided to throw me under the bus instead of making changes.

Post from when I discovered the mag sat too low in the receiver.

Reason why the metal mags don't feed well.
 
The only metal mags I have tried so far have been RRA 10 rounders. Getting FTF 4 out of 10 rounds. Have some C-Products 5/30's but never tried them.

All my plastic mags including MFT 10 round have been fine (Hera 5/30, PMAG 5/30, PMAG 5/30 M3). Glad I have mostly plastic mags, but I can always use the RRA in my AR's only.
 
Metal mags are a little hit and miss in mine with no rhyme or reason as to why. Even if they are the same type and from the same manufacturer. One will work and the next couple won't.

I have to agree that the mags sit a little low in the receiver and that could be contributing to it being abnormally picky with metal mags. I never tried bending the feed lips on the mags that didn't work because I used them in other firearms and thought it best to just leave them alone and use the ones that worked.

But on a positive note, every brand of poly mag I've tried has worked perfectly fine in the WK. And I already had plenty so I just use poly mags now.

The MFT pistol mags work 110%. They're awesome mags that have functioned flawlessly in every firearm I've stuck them in.

If you have some MFT's you shouldn't have any issues running them in the WK. If you don't have any it definitely sucks balls having to buy a bunch of a specific kind of mag just to have a rifle that runs trouble free.
 
Metal mags are a little hit and miss in mine with no rhyme or reason as to why. Even if they are the same type and from the same manufacturer. One will work and the next couple won't.

I have to agree that the mags sit a little low in the receiver and that could be contributing to it being abnormally picky with metal mags. I never tried bending the feed lips on the mags that didn't work because I used them in other firearms and thought it best to just leave them alone and use the ones that worked.

But on a positive note, every brand of poly mag I've tried has worked perfectly fine in the WK. And I already had plenty so I just use poly mags now.

The MFT pistol mags work 110%. They're awesome mags that have functioned flawlessly in every firearm I've stuck them in.

If you have some MFT's you shouldn't have any issues running them in the WK. If you don't have any it definitely sucks balls having to buy a bunch of a specific kind of mag just to have a rifle that runs trouble free.

Aye...so this is clearly a very common issue with these rifles. Thank you for the links griffin, it's wild I posted the exact same findings a while back when I first got it but assumed it was the feed ramps being too far forward and jutting out. There is no doubt in my mind, they likely designed the receiver around a specific plastic magazine or something but that's exactly what it is.
I did NOT have any plastic mags because after 14 years of shooting STANAG mag guns, I never had a single one not actually function with STANAG magazines :mad:
So I had to buy these ones and that's after paying shipping out of pocket to have the chamber reamed properly and feed ramps machined flush....
So I'm out over 200 bucks and I still can't use normal mags.
I will be fair, it's 100% reliable with the Hera and MFT 10 rounder's. ......
I'm on the fence now between selling it and just going back to good old reliable communist stamped sheet metal type 81 and a facking preorder honestly...
The search for the best NR semi auto continues...
Has wolverine or kodiak def made any statements about correcting this obvious mess up in the next batches at least for all the people still waiting?
 
I had mine out Saturday. Still only getting 2.5 -3 moa but that's with cheap 55g bulk ammo. Will try some heavier stuff and see how well it stabilizes over Christmas I hope I've had no fte and a few ftf with lar15 mags. 1 specific Lar15 mag works great though. The included Hera mags both work perfectly. Trigger has been smoothed but hammer spring is way to stiff as stated above. Also my top rail is out of spec. Machined few though to wide which caused scope rings to be bit hard to mount.....just a crappy old set of off shore rings so they prob out of spec also !! So far I've found it to be what I expected. A relatively cheap NR plinker
 
I love how that stock looks. Did you add anything between the tube and the back of the receiver? It looks less square and more cleaned up.
 
Thanks for the review T-B, I'm glad I held off getting one of these. Not being able to use a STANAG mag would drive me nuts as well. I had the RWA 180b, and it too had the same issues or similar with the mags. Plastic mags worked well, but metal STANAG mags it would bind or scrape on the left lip of the mag. I tried filing the mags a bit, but sill did not function as design or advertised. Now it is time to cancel my pre-order. Thank god, I did not have to put a down-payment down.
 
Thats really to bad the 180 has all these issues. I was seriously considering one. I have a cheap Keltec SU 16 that runs flawlessly with any mag. I was just looking for a rifle with a whole lot less plastic. I'm always Leary shooting the 16.
 
Faaack....
Then both yours had the exact same issue Sir?

I'm really wondering if it's a common thing and noone is talking about it. It's driving me nuts. If there is no fix then I won't be keeping it. I didn't buy a "STANAG" magazine rifle that takes proprietary type mags....
I'm torn because I love the rifle aside from that but it's still driving me crazy.

I have all the same issues you have had with my wk 180c using stanag magazines and like yours no issue using MFT mags. MFT mags seem to be the way to go, also not all polymer mags fit ie IWI or IMI would not fit at all, you have to shave them down to fit which I didn't bother doing
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom