Chuckbuster
CGN Ultra frequent flyer
A
My concern is that the underlying biological/ecological reasons espoused for such culls (not just the one at hand) are often unsound. Culls may reduce predation sufficiently enough to appear to work in the short term, but long term can lead to further imbalances and problems that must be solved. One of the biggest issues is habitat loss and degradation. From what I have read, a big problem facing the caribou populations in question is in fact habitat loss and degradation. Yes, a vulnerable population is more susceptible to predation, but then, that's what wolves and other predators do.
Another CGNer has provided a link to a study on Yukon culls in another thread. I have not had time to go through it carefully as yet, but in quickly looking over some relevant information, I noticed the authors stated that, in the end, culls will be ineffective if issues such as habitat degradation/loss and mortality from other sources (including other predators) is not addressed simultaneously. But, more on that after I have gone through it carefully.
i do agree with some of your points, but I have a big problem with others. I think you should have done more research on the current wolf population and plans in BC before you said what you did. I agree we as humans have knocked things out of whack, but we have to tools to help out. which include habitat restoration, culls, and other means. sad reality is habitat restoration does not happen to nearly the scale it should. another huge problem, is developing the winter range. it is very frustrating.
I really have a problem when you say culls in bc wont work, they do work, and have in the past. I know guys like to throw around the "science" word on online forums, but to be honest I have a hard time buying a lot of what you guys say, because someone said it is proven by science. especially when it has to do with a wolf cull. because for some reason wolves are a symbol among nature lovers. they will spew and twist numbers to no end to "save" the wolf.
My concern is that the underlying biological/ecological reasons espoused for such culls (not just the one at hand) are often unsound. Culls may reduce predation sufficiently enough to appear to work in the short term, but long term can lead to further imbalances and problems that must be solved. One of the biggest issues is habitat loss and degradation. From what I have read, a big problem facing the caribou populations in question is in fact habitat loss and degradation. Yes, a vulnerable population is more susceptible to predation, but then, that's what wolves and other predators do.
Another CGNer has provided a link to a study on Yukon culls in another thread. I have not had time to go through it carefully as yet, but in quickly looking over some relevant information, I noticed the authors stated that, in the end, culls will be ineffective if issues such as habitat degradation/loss and mortality from other sources (including other predators) is not addressed simultaneously. But, more on that after I have gone through it carefully.



















































