Stephano
Member
- Location
- Northern Muskokas
Did you guys do any accuracy testing ? Just curious. I’m not expecting 1/2 moa, but would like an idea.
Mr. Wolverine is hoping they are sub 2 MOA
Did you guys do any accuracy testing ? Just curious. I’m not expecting 1/2 moa, but would like an idea.
Yep, this one is out of the park.
Let’s also hope that this should reign in the prices of alternative choices in the same category.
I kinda feel sorry of all those who put in for upper and lower receivers for the same money...lol
The lower already been approved and same for the upper
Is the stock on the receiver with an adapter? Can another stock be mounted?
The firearms act is the rule. It has definitions to what is prohib, restricted or non restricted. It begins and ends there.
The frt is the database of rcmp opinion as to whether a gun is prohib, restricted or non restricted as per the definitions of the firearms act.
Rcmp opinion is not law. Only the firearms act is law.
An encyclipedia of rcmp opinion is also not law, just because all the opinion is in one place.
You don't need rcmp opinion to know if a gun is one of the three as the rules exist without the rcmp saying what they think.
If the rcmp disagree with Wolverine's opinion, there is court. At court the rcmp expert gives his opinion based on the law, and wolverine's expert gives their opinion based on the law, and a judge says which one is right. As per the judges opinion of the law and how the gun fits the law definitions.
Simple.
What's really amazing is all of that and not one gripe about 6061
The firearms act. Plus you can point to the frt if you don't know how to articulate the law, and say it is just like the armalite ar180b or nodak nds18s which the lab agree are not AR15 variants.
Beats the hell out of the stamped upper and early polymer lower.
Agree on all fronts re: the Firearms Act, the FRT and RCMP's involvement in interpretation of the law into the FRT and it's subsequent implementation.
To summarize Wolverine's position,
1. This rifle's upper and lower receiver is a reproduction of the AR180B and it meets the OAL and Barrel Length restrictions for NR in the Firearm Act and hence, per Wolverine, an FRT and a formal classification by the RCMP is not required.
2. Wolverine,using their best understanding of the Firearms Act, specifically the definition of Non Restricted and Restricted Firearms, and using precedence of the RCMP awarding NR classification for AR180B derived designs in the recent past, have unilaterally classified this rifle as "Non Restricted".
I foresee four problems with this current situation,
1. There is no precedence for Wolverine to be declared an "expert" in the classification of firearms per the Forearms Act or the Canadian Firearms Program. Rather, the RCMP is the sole responsible party (I believe they frame it as administrator) for classification, licensing, registration (etc etc) per the Act.
2. There is no independent verification or corroboration by an entity recognized by the Firearms Act - that the upper and lower receiver set is an EXACT copy and not a LIKENESS of the AR180B.
3. There is a likelihood that the RCMP may come to a different conclusion on the classification of the rifle as the gas system is NOT THE SAME as an AR180B and hence it is NOT the same gun and hence the precedence of awarding NR classification cannot be assumed. The RCMP may find the operation like <insert prohibited/ restricted gun name here> and decide NOT to give it a NR classification. Precedence is not guaranteed, and the RCMP may wish to apply it differently in this case. The RCMP have a very strong enabler in the act through one the definitions of a Restricted firearm: "a firearm of any other kind that is prescribed to be a restricted firearm".
Yes, I agree that the Laws are imperfect, but we have to abide by them. So, I believe that IF one is stopped and questioned with this rifle, be prepared for an impounded rifle, potential charges, and a certain legal fight as it would come down to Wolverine's interpretation of the law vs. the RCMPs. Wolverine's position may (perhaps should ?) win based on the way the Act defines NR but it will be messy, protracted and potentially disastrous. I believe we are in uncharted waters here.
Are there any rifles/ pistols in Canada that are currently sold without an FRT ? I guess I am looking for precedence for "sale and possession of firearms without an FRT" as that is the only other strong argument that can be made to support Wolverine's interpretation and unilateral classification - if challenged.
Well said!
If I place the order, is my credit card going to be charged immediately or when the rifle ships?
MANY OF YOU ASKING THIS QUESTIONS.
CURRENTLY WE WILL NOT SELL PARTS FOR THIS RIFLE.
WE WILL NOT MAKE ANY OTHER CALIBERS AT THIS TIME.
UPPER, LOWERS WILL NOT BE SOLD SEPARATELY.
FUTURE PROJECTS ARE IN THE FUTURE AND WILL GO THROUGH WOLVERINE SUPPLIES. PLEASE CONTACT THEM FOR MORE INFO.
WE ARE VERY BUSY ON MAKE SURE THAT WE MAKE BEST RIFLE (OUT-OF-THE-BOX) ON TIME FOR YOU AND WE WILL NOT MAKE ANY CUSTOM RIFLES AT THIS TIME.
i'm really trying hard to not jump on the band wagon........... i would like to wait and hear some reviews before i commit...........
this is hard.......




























