Would A Colt Python Stand Up To Combat Shooting?

Max Owner

CGN Ultra frequent flyer
Rating - 100%
31   0   0
Hey all.

Was thinkin about getting a 4" Python and using for IDPA style shooting.

People have claimed that Colt double action revolver actions are on the "less durable" side. Comapared to Smith & Wesson.

Thinking about running 38 specials through the gun for the sake of cheaper shooting.

Any thoughts?
 
shooting a python

The single best target I ever shot in PPC match was with a 6" out of the box, Colt python. Fantasticly tight group with .38 match wadcutter.

Then the timing went out...No one in Canada could fix it. Had a 4"..did the same thing. OK for Bullseye shooting, and for looking at...not much more.
 
Hi,

I do own a Colt Pything 6" in Royal Blue and wow, what a revolver. I just haven't tried another revolver factory or smithed that can match it (not to say there isn't, just I haven't experienced it).

The Colt action is less sturdy as the S&W even if you shoot .38's out of them. Not so the .38's, it would be the volume of .38's given that you're going to do practical comp with it.

I forget what it was that was prone to wear over mega rounds, but my impression was that the ejector star that allows the rachet to rotate to the next round (forget the part name) is prone to wear off.

And when you get a breakage, try and find the part for it. Colt doesn't even want to look at you unless you are Government. So you probably need some expert gunsmith to make you the part. US as a source, not sure but what a pain?

For high volume shooting and practical, I would go with something like a Smith&Wesson which is tough. Ok, outside of the fact that the notch is on top of each cylinder (we're talking .38's and not super magnum loads).

Wait a minute, you're talking about a 4" prohib right? so price is probably 4 to 6 bills versus 1200 for a > 4 ". In that case go for it and have fun cause at 4 to 6 bills your looking at a S&W anyways. Then just buy a couple of 4 " pythons and use one for parts.

Hope this helps
on-ca

p.s. I really love Colts, but Colt's business strategy is soooo stupid and will be their demise. They are so anti-civilian that if you look at all the gun mags over the last 10 years, there is no mention of Colt.
Any article on the AR-15 lists all makers (Armalite, Bushmaster, DPMS, Eagle,...) but doesn't list Colt. Any article on the 1911 and you hear Kimber, Wilson, Springfield and even Dan Wesson but nothing on Colt.

When there is military cutbacks, guess who will be SOL without the civillian sales to make up the shortfall? Colt
When the new generation of kids who grow up on Armalites and Kimbers become military brass, guess what they will buy? not Colt.
When "Colt" disappears from the public mind because they've been so snotty to civilians, guess what civilians will buy? not Colt.

Net result? Colt will go the way of the Do-Do bird because they are unable to create a sustainable business model.

End of Rant.
 
Last edited:
When there is military cutbacks, guess who will be SOL without the civillian sales to make up the shortfall? Colt
When the new generation of kids who grow up on Armalites and Kimbers become military brass, guess what they will buy? not Colt.
When "Colt" disappears from the public mind because they've been so snotty to civilians, guess what civilians will buy? not Colt.

another thought on this, there is the chance that the kids who grow up will go "oh sweet, we can buy colts now that we run the military!" /buy colt

yes its a slim slim chance but it could happen lol
 
I have a couple or three. Using 38 Specials I would have no problem using the Python as a combat gun for competition, and you'll not find a sweeter shooting mid caliber revolver anywhere. Folks tend to forget that when the S&W decided to upgrade the K frame magnums and designed the L frames, the Python is what they were emulating. Is it harder to service and get parts for? sure. But there is a small group of folks who can work on them, and you can get parts, it just takes a while. And at the end of the day, it would just be cool to compete with a Python, wouldn't it? - dan
 
I have a 4" Python (SS) and several S&Ws (Ks & Ls). A big reason I don't use the Python in IDPA is the competitive advantage offered by my S&Ws.

Firstly, Safariland only makes Comp IIs for the Python while Comp IIIs are available for both K and L frame S&Ws.

Secondly, I feel the 'push' style cylinder catch of the S&Ws is faster/more natural than the 'pull' style of the Colts.

Lastly, although I have several 'L' framed S&Ws, I primarily compete with my 'K' framed guns because I feel the smaller/lighter cylinder of the 'K' offers a speed advantage over both the Python and my 586/686s.

YMMV
 
I have a couple or three. Using 38 Specials I would have no problem using the Python as a combat gun for competition, and you'll not find a sweeter shooting mid caliber revolver anywhere. Folks tend to forget that when the S&W decided to upgrade the K frame magnums and designed the L frames, the Python is what they were emulating. Is it harder to service and get parts for? sure. But there is a small group of folks who can work on them, and you can get parts, it just takes a while. And at the end of the day, it would just be cool to compete with a Python, wouldn't it? - dan

++1:cheers:
 
Hey all.

Was thinkin about getting a 4" Python and using for IDPA style shooting.

People have claimed that Colt double action revolver actions are on the "less durable" side. Comapared to Smith & Wesson.

Thinking about running 38 specials through the gun for the sake of cheaper shooting.

Any thoughts?

Yes, but the double action is terrible.
 
I`m still shooting my original K frame after45 years, still functions great and is still accurate, my other one, model 14 and a four screw, is also still great in all respects. Tried a python for a few matches years ago and got rid of it. Service if needed is readily available as are parts if needed for Smiths, J, K, L and N frame. Enough said.
 
Back
Top Bottom