I'd trade a M14 for a FAL any day. That said, I'm one of the many who carried one in the service of Our Queen, so I have a bit of an irrational soft spot for it...
ditto
![]()
ditto
![]()
*Puts on asbestos suit*
Nope.
I remember when all those cheap crappy Ishapore FN's came in the country, and were selling for $99 bucks. Did not buy.
All the CF ones I ever saw were also beat to crap after decades of use.
Now, even though you can't even shoot the things, and there is a diminishing pool of 12(5) owners out here people still want inflated prices for the things. I might consider buying one on the cheap just because I can, but not for the prices people want.
Nostalgia aside, dollar for dollar the Norc m305 is a way better value. We don't appreciate what we have.
X2, bet lots of the people here that said they would trade for a FAL have never shot one lol , never shot a FAL thats even close to as accurate as my most accurate Norc lol .. Most FALs i have shot group about as good as a average AK or SKS, maybe cause they have VERY horrendous triggers !! , they sure are not much lighter than a M14 and the sights are not quite as good . They have slightly better ergos thats it .. Remember the US army was going to adopt the FAL at one point put it in trials against the M14 then decided to keep the M14.. The m14 seems to beat the FAL in the competitive long range shooting world . The M14 is WAY more tuneable and upgradeable too. good luck finding quality match grade FAL barrels .




























