I love the FAL series of rifle as much or more than the next guy, but would you actually replace your M14 with one (if you could only have one) if they were legal/non-restricted? I know many M14 guys are making do with the M14 merely because its one of the few non-resrticted 7.62 battle rifles we are actually allowed to own. But when it comes down to it, it is in many/most ways a superior rifle. So, would you actually give it up for a FAL? Just for fun lets say they are both genuine government issue (NOT NORC!), semi-auto only and the highest quality versions of each (TRW/FNC1) to make a fair comparison. The FAL is a cool, pistol gripped rifle with left hand cocking, but those are really the only practical features it has over the M14.
M14 has better sights, less parts and relatively easy accurizing methods etc., where as the FAL has better ergonomics, adjustable gas system and left hand cocking etc. Id say the M14 comes up on top.
For Canadian military history the FNC1 has no comparison.
M14 has better sights, less parts and relatively easy accurizing methods etc., where as the FAL has better ergonomics, adjustable gas system and left hand cocking etc. Id say the M14 comes up on top.
For Canadian military history the FNC1 has no comparison.
Last edited:




















































