WX-MCR - X for Xtreme - First Impressions

--Terry--

Regular
Rating - 100%
76   0   0
20210303_161220 (Medium).jpg

I received the WX-MCR from Wolverine Supplies last week, and went to the range to test-fire it. Here are some first impressions from me, who has owned and been shooting an AR-15 for years, and can't help but compare everything of this rifle to an AR-15. Maybe it is not fair (I do know a little about the history and development of AR-18/AR-180), but it is inevitable.

PROS:
1. It handles and runs like an AR-15, and there is no learning curve. Ergonomics is good compared to other older rifle designs.
2. Trigger is better than what I had expected. I don't have a trigger gauge, but the trigger breaks clean and crisp, with zero creep.
3. It has most of the improvements already in place, and seems to be a quite mature design.
4. It shoots well, and seems to be accurate. I will need to do more shooting to find out how good it can be.
5. All mags I have work fine in the rifle. Pmags need a firm tap to seat, and do not drop free, but that happens to other guns, too. Traditional aluminum mags work flawlessly.

CONS:
1. The rifle is heavy, front heavy. I guess it is due to the heavy-ish long barrel and long handguard.
2. The receiver has many sharp corners and edges. I especially don't like the front corners of the mag well, which are very sharp. Bumping into them is painful, and could break skin. I understand that the rifle is modeled after the stamped steel style of the AR-18, but since we have made changes to the design, it does not make sense to have the sharp edges. Maybe the person who made the drawings forgot to add the edge chamfer/fillet?
3. The WX receiver does come in a more greyish finish, not as black as the other parts of the rifle. But it is not too bad, and is not very noticable in daylight.

I installed a Primary Arms 3x Prism scope on the WX-MCR, mainly to shoot at targets at 100 yards in my local range. Other better scopes can surely be used to achieve better results, but I'm still concerned about the weight.

I replaced the pistol grip with a Magpul one, which is thicker and nicer to grip and handle. My next experiment is to try to install the Zhukov folding stock on it, and see how it feels. It will arrive sometime next week.

The one thing that keeps bugging me now is the sharp edges and corners on the receiver. As a tinkerer, I want to smooth out the edges with a diamond file. But I'm worried about damaging the anodizing layer, and what I should do with the exposed aluminum. I'm now tortured by OCD. Any suggestions?

If you say Canadian manufacturers have worked hard to provide such a good NR rifle, and why I'm complaining about small things like finish and sharp edges? I think the WK-180C / WS-MCR / WX-MCR rifles are still in early stages of development, and there will be more improvements made in the coming years. Those of us who buy them now are brave enough to know (before we buy) and accept some imperfections and use them as they are. But we should also voice our complaints without hesitation, so manufacturers know what they need to work on in the next batches.

In a few years, if by some miracle this rifle is not banned (knock on wood), it may become a mature enough design that people like as much as AR-15s.

Targets at 100 yards with a 3x scope:
20210306_111132 (Medium).jpg

20210306_110902 (Medium).jpg
 

Attachments

  • 20210303_161220 (Medium).jpg
    20210303_161220 (Medium).jpg
    46.8 KB · Views: 828
  • 20210306_111132 (Medium).jpg
    20210306_111132 (Medium).jpg
    143 KB · Views: 829
  • 20210306_110902 (Medium).jpg
    20210306_110902 (Medium).jpg
    102.8 KB · Views: 824
Last edited:
Nice review.

There was another thread with some barrel weight talk on these, and front end weight:
WS-MCR medium barrel ...2.17 lbs
Alberta Tactical replacement light barrel ....1.75 lbs
Alberta Tactical replacement medium barrel.....2.35 lbs
https://www.canadiangunnutz.com/forum/showthread.php/2113816-WS-MCR-compatibility

It would be interesting to know the weight of the WS-MCR handguard.

Thanks. It would be nice to put on a light barrel and a light (and slightly shorter) handguard. But that may be a lot of money for a small improvement.
 
Those groups aren't bad. I'd be interested to see what it can do with other ammo and a higher powered scope.

We had my buddies new MCR out this past weekend and we threw a few kinds of ammo through it. I had a 1-8 Strike Eagle sitting around, so we zero'd it and it made some garbage groups with norc ammo, but after we swapped to Winchester white box and Federal AE we got down to around 1- 1.5 MOA. We even had 3 touching with 2 that were about 1.25" away. Not too shabby.
 
Great write up and thanks for sharing it. With a LPVO My WS version was getting about 1.25 inches at 100yards. 62gr Federal AE. With some serious glass and match ammo this rifle will most likely be able to achieve sub moa groups. Real fun rifle too. Part 2 of the MCR accuracy videos we did shows that grouping etc. I am sure you will enjoy the rifle quite a bit as you get used to it. :)
 
The one thing that keeps bugging me now is the sharp edges and corners on the receiver. As a tinkerer, I want to smooth out the edges with a diamond file. But I'm worried about damaging the anodizing layer, and what I should do with the exposed aluminum. I'm now tortured by OCD.

Any suggestions?
 
Last edited:
Can you CeraKote over anodization? If that is the case, you could file off the bad edges, and then CeraKote over the whole rifle to a colour of your choice.
 
These rifles are surprisingly accurate. I shot a 10 rd 1.6 moa group at 100 yards, prone (bipod and rear bag) with hand loaded 75s and a 1-8 LPVO. Woulda been sub-1.5moa but I had to pull one, haha. Totally acceptable for a factory barrel.
 
The more I shoot them, the more I like them

But for sure, the sharp parts and pointy bits are a drawback. The front and rear of the receiver and the handguard/rails. Part of my wants to take a diamond stone to it and then cerakote it. I actually think some company offering this service might have some customers. I don't know if removing some anodization really matters much, lots of well used AR15's have the finish worn off on edges. But I'm not an anodization expert. :)
 
Back
Top Bottom