If your still open to other options check out the Ameriglo Hackathorn sights, or the Trijicon HD's. Both offer a large highly visible front dot but in the notched rear that makes it much easier to aquire, and more accurate than the big dots 'post and dot' configuration.
I could definitely point you in a good direction, but I would argue that direction is "away from XS big dots".
If your still open to other options check out the Ameriglo Hackathorn sights, or the Trijicon HD's. Both offer a large highly visible front dot but in the notched rear that makes it much easier to aquire, and more accurate than the big dots 'post and dot' configuration.
Personally I don't think they give you anything you can't get from other high-visibility sights, and you lose a substantial amount of precision on harder shots. They make hard shots harder, and they don't make easy shots easier.
You can train around their deficiencies and I know some people who have, but in my experience most people who compare them to other sights when using timers and scoring their hits find that they are consistently worse with XS big dots.
I think if you could get them with a notch rear that allowed more precise alignment they'd be okay, or maybe even good. But I think that rear sight is terrible and the fact that you just do not see them in high-level competition, where speed and precision both count, is to me a pretty good indication that they don't work that well for many shooters.
I heard a Ken Hackathorn quote earlier today about them that I thought was pretty good: "XS sights work great at distances at which you can point-shoot anything."
They were really big around the same time Tactical Response was the go-to high-speed training outfit to learn from, probably because James Yeager was a big user of them.
I think he's pretty much the only big name ever associated with big dots...and his name is not exactly up there with Thomas Jefferson these days.
lol are they so bad?
Tried them and did not liked them at all. Fast target acquisition but the accuracy will suffer. Get the Trijicon HD, MUCH better.
I know the pitch. I don't agree that the margin of error they provide is "acceptable".
I have heard that same comment from a number of people who shoot them well - which I have seen done. In fact I ran in to a guy last year who had taken the rear right off his Glock, and only used the front.
But to me that says "this guy could be point shooting with about that level of accuracy".
They're workable and some people do better with them than others but I would hate to have to make a low-probability shot with big dots.




























