Zastavabuild

Yeah but why waste an opportunity to be a smartass?

Just suggesting a base I have used on many mausers as per the thread.

You might be confused; i'm the guy who suggested the ring/mount combo not the one who responded sarcastically congratulating my choice of mounts.

If the scope length allows, I put talleys on everything. One of the few products I am generally happy to recommend to others for use on a variety of firearms in a variety of situations.

In fact the only reason I mentioned the height I used was that I've had issues with other low rings on 2 piece mounting setups with this specific receiver.

I am the poster suggesting the talleys? Why is this so hard for people to figure out?

First I come under attack for a reasonable suggestion, now 2x (!!!) people are thinking I'm the one calling myself out?

Is this the twilight zone?

Amazing, twilight it is...

Talley all the wayy;)
 
Freddy maybe you should add my original post in there to avoid any confusion that might come from me using my given name...

Wait what kind of mounts did I suggest again?

Was it talleys?
 
OK, thanks for the suggestions. I have found some two piece Leupold mounts and Leupold rings (medium) that will go in the rifle. As for the comment that the Zastava receiver is not the best for a custom build, I am aware of what has been said about the internal finish but honestly The Zastava is about the only game in town for a reasonably priced left handed Mauser action, so that's the way I went. Just wish me luck with it.

As a lefty I get it. With something like a Mauser or 700 or P14/M17 with different heights in the actions for ring mounting surfaces (as compared to a savage or 788) it makes me suspect of things being out of alignment easier. My instinct is to Lapp rings mounted on those types of actions especially if they are steel rings.
 
Back
Top Bottom