New Camper
CGN frequent flyer
- Location
- Lurking in the woods near SFRC.
I've already decided on the angled occular lens as it will be used for spotting bullet holes from 100 - 1000m. Beyond 300-400m, bullet holes will be produced by anything from 6.5mm to 30 cal, but under that distance mostly 224 caliber. Light conditions would vary as the weather, and be during daylight hours.
Anyway, base point would be nothing less than a Vortex Diamondback, but I am considering the Viper HD 20-80.
So as usual for these threads, I have a few questions(having already looked through threads found with the search function and the lame "stand in a building and talk about the scope" reviews). Foremost question is what magnification range is optimal for observing bullet holes as described above? Is this one of few cases where "more magnification is better"? Optic quality: I don't want to regret the day I bought the glass, so while keeping it affordable, cheaping out is not an option so where does this criteria set, before excluding possibility?
Ideally (and with thanks), I would appreciate the recommendations of those who have once trod this path.
Anyway, base point would be nothing less than a Vortex Diamondback, but I am considering the Viper HD 20-80.
So as usual for these threads, I have a few questions(having already looked through threads found with the search function and the lame "stand in a building and talk about the scope" reviews). Foremost question is what magnification range is optimal for observing bullet holes as described above? Is this one of few cases where "more magnification is better"? Optic quality: I don't want to regret the day I bought the glass, so while keeping it affordable, cheaping out is not an option so where does this criteria set, before excluding possibility?
Ideally (and with thanks), I would appreciate the recommendations of those who have once trod this path.


















































