Mazzadonis
Member
- Location
- In a van, down by the Fraser river.
Gentleman, I am posting here as I have reached a major conundrum. First and foremost I should state that I am seeking advice regarding a first firearm purchase. Until this day it was my intention to buy a Norinco M305 as my first rifle. Now before you get your knickers in a knot at the thought of that, read on please. It has been my all-time favourite firearm as far as things go aesthetically, and historically ever since I saw jolly boot camp privates like Forest Gump and Leonard Pyle assemble it with enthusiastic precision. One must wonder what it would be like to play ping-pong and eat donuts all with the assurance of your M14 stowed away safe in a footlocker, sitting there peacefully, yet unconditionally protective of your god-given right to wholesome American leisure.
I’m guessing some of you are still thinking - first firearm choice/semi-auto .308 = "you gon’ full retard son”
Allow me to explain my situation further. I have fair experience with firearms already, and I feel comfortable around their use and operation. For what it’s worth my PAL holding friends say I have good shooting habits and that I rarely flinch. I have shot well over 1000 rounds in various calibre’s including .22, 7.62x39, 12 gauge, and .30-30 with them and with my 6’2, 250 pound frame I feel that I am ready for a high-power cartridge. That being said, under normal circumstances my first choice for a rifle would be a 10/22 or a Cooey bolt .22 like many others here in Canada, but I am in the lucky position of being able to acquire both a 10/22 and an old break-action SxS from a friend by trade when my PAL comes back in the mail. For this reason my first choice for a PURCHASE will be something with a bit of zing. I apologize for the frkin’ novel I’m writing here, but I wanted it to be clear why I originally narrowed it down to an M305, not too mention all the obvious value. I intend for my first rifle to not only please aesthetically, “historically", and functionally, but also to serve equally as well as a paper puncher, and a beginner buck gun for shots in the bush between 100-300 yards.
Now to talk about the issue at hand. My local outfitter here in Victoria, BC has had for a while now a nice M305 shorty in that good looking Italian wood stock they offered briefly. Personally I prefer the classic appeal of the full sized barrel, but it is my understanding with .308 there is little difference in ballistics between an 18" and 22” barrel. The one at my store is a bit pricey compared to what they were selling for online, but at $899 vs. $2000+ for a Springfield, I don’t see the price as much of an issue.
The issue is the gun I saw today when I came in to pick-up a manual for the BC CORE. It immediately stood out at me in it’s quintessential imperialistic glory. The most immaculate Lee-Enfield No.4 Mk.1 I had ever seen in person or on the webs. I couldn’t even believe it to be original at first sight, I thought it was one of those new production AIA .308’s. It was not, It was original/un-issued and the finest looking pop-stick I’de ever laid my big blue peepers on. It is my shame to say I was too awestruck to think of grabbing my phone and snapping a pic, but the thing was so goddamn good looking I’m not even sure the fella at the shop would of been comfortable with that. The closest thing I can liken it to would be the lower lightly-coloured Lee-Enfield on this page http://www.mindspring.com/~rmgill/britkit/weapons/no4.html but of a condition so pristine it was if I was looking through space and time to see my grandfather with his shouldered at arms length, marching his men down Yates Street before setting off for the English Channel.
So to cut a long story short, I am now incredibly torn between the 2 rifles. I only intend to buy 1 of the 2 in the foreseeable future and now I feel myself being inescapably pulled towards the .303 for it’s patriotic - colony whopping - nazi tromping- nostalgia value. It’s feel like I’m on a cloud where regularly paying $26.99 and up for a box wouldn’t even make my soul wince. I know there are more things to think about, but I’m in the Enfield-Cloud now and that $1000 dollar price tag just looks like a white feather dusting away unwarranted hands from touching what was made over 60 years ago for a man unborn.
I’m posting in this forum for a reason. Bring me back to my senses. Tell me I can’t afford the ammo. Tell me that lightning-fast Enfield action has nothing on the twang of a roughly-forged receiver chewing through crappy Chinese surplus. Tell me about your rifle, tell me about your gun. Which one is for fighting? Please omit stories of the one for fun.


Cheers!
I’m guessing some of you are still thinking - first firearm choice/semi-auto .308 = "you gon’ full retard son”
Allow me to explain my situation further. I have fair experience with firearms already, and I feel comfortable around their use and operation. For what it’s worth my PAL holding friends say I have good shooting habits and that I rarely flinch. I have shot well over 1000 rounds in various calibre’s including .22, 7.62x39, 12 gauge, and .30-30 with them and with my 6’2, 250 pound frame I feel that I am ready for a high-power cartridge. That being said, under normal circumstances my first choice for a rifle would be a 10/22 or a Cooey bolt .22 like many others here in Canada, but I am in the lucky position of being able to acquire both a 10/22 and an old break-action SxS from a friend by trade when my PAL comes back in the mail. For this reason my first choice for a PURCHASE will be something with a bit of zing. I apologize for the frkin’ novel I’m writing here, but I wanted it to be clear why I originally narrowed it down to an M305, not too mention all the obvious value. I intend for my first rifle to not only please aesthetically, “historically", and functionally, but also to serve equally as well as a paper puncher, and a beginner buck gun for shots in the bush between 100-300 yards.
Now to talk about the issue at hand. My local outfitter here in Victoria, BC has had for a while now a nice M305 shorty in that good looking Italian wood stock they offered briefly. Personally I prefer the classic appeal of the full sized barrel, but it is my understanding with .308 there is little difference in ballistics between an 18" and 22” barrel. The one at my store is a bit pricey compared to what they were selling for online, but at $899 vs. $2000+ for a Springfield, I don’t see the price as much of an issue.
The issue is the gun I saw today when I came in to pick-up a manual for the BC CORE. It immediately stood out at me in it’s quintessential imperialistic glory. The most immaculate Lee-Enfield No.4 Mk.1 I had ever seen in person or on the webs. I couldn’t even believe it to be original at first sight, I thought it was one of those new production AIA .308’s. It was not, It was original/un-issued and the finest looking pop-stick I’de ever laid my big blue peepers on. It is my shame to say I was too awestruck to think of grabbing my phone and snapping a pic, but the thing was so goddamn good looking I’m not even sure the fella at the shop would of been comfortable with that. The closest thing I can liken it to would be the lower lightly-coloured Lee-Enfield on this page http://www.mindspring.com/~rmgill/britkit/weapons/no4.html but of a condition so pristine it was if I was looking through space and time to see my grandfather with his shouldered at arms length, marching his men down Yates Street before setting off for the English Channel.
So to cut a long story short, I am now incredibly torn between the 2 rifles. I only intend to buy 1 of the 2 in the foreseeable future and now I feel myself being inescapably pulled towards the .303 for it’s patriotic - colony whopping - nazi tromping- nostalgia value. It’s feel like I’m on a cloud where regularly paying $26.99 and up for a box wouldn’t even make my soul wince. I know there are more things to think about, but I’m in the Enfield-Cloud now and that $1000 dollar price tag just looks like a white feather dusting away unwarranted hands from touching what was made over 60 years ago for a man unborn.
I’m posting in this forum for a reason. Bring me back to my senses. Tell me I can’t afford the ammo. Tell me that lightning-fast Enfield action has nothing on the twang of a roughly-forged receiver chewing through crappy Chinese surplus. Tell me about your rifle, tell me about your gun. Which one is for fighting? Please omit stories of the one for fun.
Cheers!





















































