Not surprised at all. Although I think it is more along the lines that stiffer barrels are more accurate.
Not too sure why one length is more accurate than the other.
I'm sure there are numerous variables coming into play.
I'm sure the ammo has a lot to do with it, as it is put together for military application, where more rounds downrange are used vice precision.
I haven't looked too much into the actual makeup of the barrels between the 2 rifles, but there is a possibility that the longer barrel is stiffer, thus giving better results.
And sorry for the confusion, i was speaking of MOA.
I could only wish/dream to be getting 1" groupings starting at 700yds.
I'm sure it's possible, but something tells me Lucky Charms, and horse shoes would be involved.
On a different note, does anyone have any tips on wind calculations?
I think in the past i have had luck with just random guessing.
Is this more of a skill that is acquired through practice?
On the range i have setup in the toolies (off-grid), i put flaggers tape up on sticks and random markers (different colors for different range), and i use those to read the wind shifts as i reach further out with a shot.
It is a clearcut area, about 4-500yds across, and probably about 2 miles long, shooting position is about 20 degrees above, so i am aiming at a downward angle (chose this way for safety, as there are no burms plowed in).
Now, i know that flight path and alot of other things are going to change, as i am starting the round at a -20 degree angle right out of the spout, compared to if i was at a flat shooting position (0-degree elevation from horizon) or elevated (angled uphill, 20-40 degree), so the fall of shot i'm assuming starts immediately.
Does that make sense?




















































