Why can't we hunt with handguns?

And, if I recall correctly, a couple of yahoos entered a bar wearing their handguns on their hips. Kaladar area if memory serves.
Another case of "Pushing The Envelope" until you get a reaction.

And that's certainly a reasonable cause to punish all the law abiding handgun hunters in the entire country. - dan
 
Our youngest boy, who is 11, asked me a similar question a little while back. His question was why I couldn't take any of my handguns on our private farmland (several thousands of acres) and shoot them. When I explained to him about our transport restrictions and other tid bits in our Firearms Act in regard to restricted firearms, even at his age he failed to find any logic in it. "Dad, like, the dumbest thing ever!" So, what did Daddy learn about the entire conversation? We need more pre teen kids in government!
 
The Liberals did a scientific study at one time that showed every time a handgun was fired at an approved range, somewhere in Canada a puppy and a kitten died. And if a handgun was fired off of an approved range, somewhere in Canada a puppy and kitten died, 3 convenience stores got robbed, 1 little old lady got mugged, 16 gang bangers magically received handguns (which they immediately registered of course), and someone stole candy from a baby. All of Canada's gun laws are based on the outcome of this very thorough and scientifically sound study. :runaway:

So by not hunting with our handguns we are doing our part to keep Canada crime free.
 
The Liberals did a scientific study at one time that showed every time a handgun was fired at an approved range, somewhere in Canada a puppy and a kitten died. And if a handgun was fired off of an approved range, somewhere in Canada a puppy and kitten died, 3 convenience stores got robbed, 1 little old lady got mugged, 16 gang bangers magically received handguns (which they immediately registered of course), and someone stole candy from a baby. All of Canada's gun laws are based on the outcome of this very thorough and scientifically sound study. :runaway:

So by not hunting with our handguns we are doing our part to keep Canada crime free.

This might as well be the truth, it makes at least as much sense as the crap we are fed through the media every day.
Kristian
 
FWIW from wikipedia some interesting tidbits....
-History of firearm laws in Canada
Controls on civilian use of firearms date from the early days of Confederation, when justices of the peace could impose penalties for carrying a handgun without reasonable cause.[1] Criminal Code of Canada (Criminal Code or Code criminel) amendments between the 1890s and the 1970s introduced a series of minor controls on firearms. In the late 1970s, controls of intermediate strength were introduced. In the mid-1990s, significant increases in controls occurred.

-The following is a summary of the history of gun control laws in Canada:
The federal Parliament instituted a system of gun control in the North-West Territories in 1885 to hinder the Red River Rebellion for Metis rights. Permission in writing from the territorial government was needed to possess any firearm (other than a smooth-bore shotgun), and also ammunition. Possession of a firearm or ammunition without the necessary permit was an offence, and could lead to the forfeiture of the firearm and ammunition. These gun control provisions applied to all of what is now Alberta, Saskatchewan, parts of Manitoba, the current Northwest Territories, Yukon, and Nunavut.
The Criminal Code of Canada enacted in 1892, required individuals to have a permit to carry a pistol unless the owner had cause to fear assault or injury. Not until 1935 was it considered an offence to sell a pistol to anyone under 16. Vendors who sold handguns had to keep records, including purchaser's name, the date of sale and a description of the gun.
In the 1920s, permits became necessary for all firearms newly acquired by foreigners.
Legislation in 1934 required the registration of handguns with records identifying the owner, the owner's address and the firearm. Registration certificates were issued and records kept by the Commissioner of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) or by other police forces designated by provincial attorneys general.
In 1947, the offence of “constructive murder” was added to the Criminal Code for offences resulting in death, when the offender carried a firearm. This offence was struck down as unconstitutional by the Supreme Court of Canada in a 1987 case called R. v. Vaillancourt.
Automatic firearms were added to the category of firearms that had to be registered in 1951. The registry system was centralized under the Commissioner of the RCMP.
In 1969, Bill C-150 created categories of “non-restricted,” “restricted” and “prohibited” firearms. Police were also given preventive powers of search and seizure by judicial warrant if they had grounds to believe that firearms that belonged to an individual endangered the safety of society.
In 1977, Bill C-51 required firearms acquisition certificates (FACs) to purchase any firearm, and introduced controls on the selling of ammunition. Applicants were required to pass a basic criminal record check before receiving the FAC.

It wasnt until 1935 store owners where required to have a ledger with the name date sold description of sold item and to whom it was sold to or they could be fined.

Does it answer the question ''what can we not hunt with handguns'' ?
Probably not, but it does show it has been a hot topic since the days of before Confederation.

Take it for what it is worth and it was long before PETRO Canada....
Tight Groups,
Rob
 
Well, I'm not holding my breath that they will change the law any time soon, but just to be on the safe side I'm ready if they do....

DSCN0312_zps63cac31c.jpg
 
Not really. I think the origins are a carry over from our basis of the British law system.

Incorrect.

In Canada (certain provinces, depending on hunting reg's) you could hunt with a handgun (small game, at least) until Turdo pulled the plug in 1975 (6?).

You could shoot your handgun anywhere you could legally shoot your rifle. Plinking was done legally.
 
Last edited:
"Gun control" is incremental. Once a government passes a law removing a "right", it is very difficult (but not impossible) to get that right back.
 
Incorrect.

In Canada (certain provinces, depending on hunting reg's) you could hunt with a handgun (small game, at least) until Turdo pulled the plug in 1975 (6?).

You could shoot your handgun anywhere you could legally shoot your rifle. Plinking was done legally.

Okay, I may well be mistaken. I started into handgun shooting here in B.C. in the late 60's, and I don't ever recall, being able to hunt any game with one or go plinking at the likes of a gravel pit etc., legally. Having been an 'option' at that time, I damm sure I would've been doing it, legally.
 
Is there any logic at all behind this? I mean,theres a special deer season for bow+muzzle loaders,why should handguns not be allowed then too? It would make much more sense to buy a bigger,more powerful revolver like the S+W 500,if you could actually use it for something beside blowing bigger holes in paper. The skill required to get a deer within 40 yards to shoot with a big revolver would be the same as required by bow hunters. I just don't see the logic here.

No logic, residual British paranoia about handguns...goes back prior to the founding of the Dominion of Canada.
 
Back
Top Bottom