Taken with a grain of salt, my experience with 1911 triggers include two Sig's. Maybe 1500-2000 rounds.
Sig 1 had a firm pull but crisp break. Accuracy suffered from how firm of pull it requires, but otherwise creep was non-existent.
Sig 2 has a rather light pull considering factory trigger, but has creep, small amount of "grit". Accuracy suffers on slow shots (still a very accurate gun), but what I think it improved on is my competition (3gun) use where trigger pull is important, but you're not making precise shots. Two in the A zone and move on type shooting. Here is where a constant, smooth pull negated any creep the trigger might have. I can easily say the trigger didn't affect my scoring.
Trojan, maybe 30-50 test trigger pulls appears to be not only light, but crisp. I'd like to shoot with it first, but I'm tempted to say it beats both Sig triggers by a sizeable margin. Its around or better for breaking than Sig 1, but has as light or lighter pull than Sig 2.
Would money make it better? Maybe. I haven't felt a reworked trigger and don't expect this to a be an ultra light pull. Overall I'm impressed but it depends what you are comparing it to. At the end of the day it is a relatively inexpensive 1911 at $1300 price range.
My biggest complaints:
1) Finish. I knew this going in. It's going to be a comp gun, run hard, and holstered. I expect the finish the wear and show the odd scratch, etc. It's well documented that STI, at least on the Trojans has an issue with this. I wouldn't expect it to be fixed or be improved on "newer" guns. A small part of me likes a gun with character. It shows it's experience and that's not a bad thing.
2) A gun of this quality should come with a mag well.
3) The rear strap being plastic should be metal. It's got the 25-30? LPI checkering, but it's not near aggressive as a metal equivalent. I know many don't like raw hands, but I love 1911's because of their "stick".
4) The front sight being black/black leaves a bit to be desired. Not sure if I'm going to tag it with some high vis paint, or change to a fibre optic sight. It's optional when you buy one though.
Where I notice the difference:
1) Tightness and finish. The beaver tail appears to be finished once the gun was assembled. The lines flow very well. Same with the grip safety and slide safety. Overall the tooling is good but for the guys who pay attention to the fine details, there were some tooling marks on either side of the barrel ramp (the ramp itself is mirrored), as well as a few marks around the trigger guard. Acceptable on a 1300$ gun? I think so, but still surprised the minor imperfections aren't caught/fixed, or tooling improved to stop it. At the end of the day, the Trojan is probably their most popular gun so their manufacturing numbers are probably the highest.
2) The slide locks into battery. No slop or light closing. It hangs up while locked. No wiggle, no easily pulling it out of battery. There's a "hump" required to get it to rack.
3) The slide is very tight. No noticeable rocking. Slides very well with proper lube, and seems to allude great fitting. Sounds are light and crisp. Almost like a cheezy movie dubbing the sounds of guns. Much of the same sound experience can be felt. It FEELS well made inside.
Hope that helps. I bought the gun used from a CGN member. It has me kicking myself in the arse that I didn't buy another one from FV's sale though.