Picture of the day

That's damned impressive.

lMDeewO.jpg


"OK, tank's busted. Everyone get out with handguns and such and give 'em what for..."

Likely from the same shoot:

wjDKydw.jpg


Kodachrome?
 
The tank is an early war model, but the Thompson is not. I think.

Likely pre war. The cocking handle is the split model on the top of the receiver, it has a Couts Compensator and an adjustable rear sight with protective ears. The early 50 round drum is also a tell tale. The tank is a Grant I believe and was reasonably well regarded by its crews but slow and expensive to produce. Two different versions there as well. One with a side sponson mounted gun as well as one with both the side gun and turret mounted gun. It also suffered from being bolted/riveted together rather than cast/welded. I can just imaging the damaged done to the crew inside that tank from flying nuts/bolts/rivets when it was even hit with a glancing round.
 
The M3 Grant/Lee tank was an interim measure until the Sherman was fielded as the standard US medium tank. It was used in combat by both the Brits and the US Army in North Africa (the Russians used some lend lease ones as well). It was a useful training vehicle and, like the Sherman, was reliable from an automotive aspect. As a fighting vehicle it suffered from inadequate armor, a high sillouhette, and an inadequate main gun with limited traverse (although the British liked the 75mm HE round against German anti-tank guns).

These are nice photos from a PR point of view. In reality the crew of a disabled tank would get away from the vehicle rather than dismounting and trying to defend it with revolvers and SMGs. If the vehicle was a mobility kill with the armament remaining servicable the tank could still be fought using it's weapons as long as ammo was available.

The Thompson is a Model 1928A1. These were produced into 1943 when they were replaced by the simplified M1A1. Thompsons were issued as on board equipment for US tanks until replaced by the M3 "Greasegun".
 
Lil' ratface Goebbels had a field day with that picture:

http://4.bp.########.com/-t7rYTIFur50/Ur9bLajA6yI/AAAAAAAAIG8/o62WDof4xxU/s1600/Winston+Churchill+with+a+Tommy+Gun+during+an+inspection+near+Harlepool,+1940+1.jpg

And believe it or not, even the current batch of skin-donor Nazi idiots still get mileage out of it:

churchill-war-criminal.jpg


Worst. Photoshop. Ever.
 
The M3 Grant/Lee tank was an interim measure until the Sherman was fielded as the standard US medium tank. It was used in combat by both the Brits and the US Army in North Africa (the Russians used some lend lease ones as well). It was a useful training vehicle and, like the Sherman, was reliable from an automotive aspect. As a fighting vehicle it suffered from inadequate armor, a high sillouhette, and an inadequate main gun with limited traverse (although the British liked the 75mm HE round against German anti-tank guns).

These are nice photos from a PR point of view. In reality the crew of a disabled tank would get away from the vehicle rather than dismounting and trying to defend it with revolvers and SMGs. If the vehicle was a mobility kill with the armament remaining servicable the tank could still be fought using it's weapons as long as ammo was available.

The Thompson is a Model 1928A1. These were produced into 1943 when they were replaced by the simplified M1A1. Thompsons were issued as on board equipment for US tanks until replaced by the M3 "Greasegun".

Bogart made a movie with an M3 once.

450568-bogart_on_m3_lee_tank___sahara_1943.jpg


If you ever get a chance to see Sahara, it's a passbly decent product of its time. The Grant plays a significant role.
 
Ole Winston was a pretty brave fellow in his own time too I recall.
And that generation did like it's cups

There was a program on History a while back about the government bomb shelters used/built during the Blitz. Talked about what a pain in the ass Winston was to his security detail, going up on the roof with a cigar and a bottle of whiskey to watch the bombing.
 
Back
Top Bottom