Wow. How much does that brass cost? And who does it?
Gunnar from Armco used to sell it. I'd think it wouldn't be too hard for a machine shop to make some.
Source http://www.realguns.com/archives/106.htm
---------------------------- Std ACP----- +P----- Super----- Rowland
Primer Pocket Depth------ 0.116----- 0.121----- 0.124----- 0.124
Web Thickness------------ 0.067----- 0.059----- 0.074----- 0.054
Case Head to Web--------- 0.185----- 0.185----- 0.195----- 0.178
Overall Case Length------ 0.886----- 0.894----- 0.896----- 0.956
Std ACP ----- +P ----- Super ----- Rowland
![]()
I will be doing just that myself and will post the procedure and my results some time in February. I'll be making 45-08 brass and comparing it to 45 ACP, 45 +P, and 45 Super concering weight and powder capacity.
45-08 brass is far stronger about the base than 45 ACP, 45 +P, 45 Super, or 460 Rowland, but has less capacity as a result.
The .45-08 is just cut down .308 that has been machined inside to allow a bullet to seat, I'm thinking everything back of the bullet is stronger then typical pistol brass.
![]()
So this whole 460 thing seems like a farce at this point....compared to 45/08.
A barrel you don't need, brass that is longer but weaker even then .45acp brass....
Sure prepping .308 brass will take some time, but will save you over $400, give better performance, and greater safety with stronger brass
So this whole 460 thing seems like a farce at this point....compared to 45/08.
A barrel you don't need, brass that is longer but weaker even then .45acp brass....
Sure prepping .308 brass will take some time, but will save you over $400, give better performance, and greater safety with stronger brass
The 460 ROWLAND has external dimensions identical to the .45 ACP case with the exception of length. The 460 case is approximately 1/16th an inch longer (460 ROWLAND case length is .957 in.) than the .45 ACP case to prevent chambering in an unmodified .45 ACP gun with safety as a prime consideration. Internally, the 460 ROWLAND case is much stronger than the .45 ACP case with an entirely different design and pressure capacity. Loading information for the 460 should NEVER!!!! be interchanged or substituted in .45 ACP cases
What then is a .460 Rowland? It is simply a .45 ACP case that has been stretched and strengthened. Starline is making the brass, head stamped ".460 ROWLAND", that is 1/16 of an inch longer than the standard .45 ACP (standard .45 ACP reloading dies work) with a beefed up interior.
not sure where your getting your info there bro, but ill let you do the testing.
me, im gonna use the 460 brass, im too pretty to have a slide cave my face in just because some internet warrior said so.
i dont know, that says to me its beefier.
when your dealing with pressures around 40,000 im gonna take the safe route and use the brass and barrels intended for them.
So this whole 460 thing seems like a farce at this point....compared to 45/08.
I just want to hear from someone first hand, who has actually loaded to real .44-Magnum levels.
A normal load for me is a 240 grain bullet, with 12 grains of Unique powder.
That's what I want to see in a Rowland conversion, before I buy into any hype.
That's definitely moving. What weight of recoil spring are you using when shooting those loads? I assume you aren't running a comp.Personally, I have run 200grn LSWC at 1500 fps out of a 5" barrel 1911 (Canadian Para Ordnance P14-LTD) with a schuemann bull barrel. .308 Win cases (Winchester brass). CCI Primers, Longshot Powder. Very stout... only problem I had was a weak mag release spring that would cause the mag to drop. LOL replaced with new spring and never had a problem. This seems to be right at the limit.