I never said or even implied there was anything wrong with making money......I like money as much as the next guy, maybe even more. After being in business for more than 35 years, I have no issue with the free enterprise system, and if you can invent and market a better "widget" and make a couple million then good for you. I just do not personally think either one of these is a better "widget" and there is no market in which to sell a couple million units. Therefore Nosler's motivation must be questioned, especially at over 4 bucks a pop for brass. I think they have let their corporate ego run amuck and think that an elite bunch of snobbie shooters will embrace their cartridges BECAUSE their brass is over 4 bucks a pop and they seek to create that elite market...........apparently they know a whole different bunch of shooters than I do, cause I don't know anybody that will willingly pay nearly 100 bucks for 20 brass..........besides brass is a consumable and needs to be cheap if one wants their latest fad to even have a hope of catching on.
Neither cartridge will out-do the equivalent cal based on a 300 WM case and that brass is available everywhere, as are reamers and one can readily use 264 WM and 7 RM dies to load for them............Besides they are not even new, they are just slightly modified and stolen from Dakota, with just enough change so that Dakota brass cannot be used..........
You know I give Ruger credit with their case for the 375, at least they did something completely new and pretty much unexplored since Newton's cartridges of the 20s. Now that takes balls and innovation and I think there is a very real purpose in a non-belted case with the same dia as a belted case at the belt. It has merit in my opinion. Just to steal someone else's design and add a few thou to the length to make the original unusable, borders on fraudulent.