Picture of the day

Sorry - no pictures

By LtCol. A.J. D'Amario USAF Ret. From the pages of the American
Rifleman, November 2013.

On my first solo flight at K-13, Suwan, Korea, in June 1952, I took
off in an F-80 Shooting Star. It was not a combat mission. All I had
to do was go up and have fun boring holes in the sky for about an
hour and a half.

Immediately after takeoff, I felt the left wing was heavy and
determined that the left tip fuel tank was not feeding properly or
not at all. Afraid it might fall off and rupture during landing,
potentially melting asphalt on the runway, the tower would not let me
land with the full tank. I was instructed to make a bomb run and drop
the whole tank.

Arriving at the bomb range, I set up my bomb-release switches to
release the tank. Flying over the impact area, I pushed the button
but nothing happened. I tried a second time and again there was no
response. On my next pass, I tried the manual release handle but to
no avail. Making one final run, I used the button we called the
"panic button" because it allegedly released everything hanging on
the airplane. It worked as advertised and dumped everything, save my
errant left tip tank.

The tower control officer advised me that if I couldn't get rid of
the tank or its contents, I should give them my location, eject and
await pickup.

Well. Pilots really hate to punch out of a perfectly flyable airplane
and I figured I still had one option worth trying.
The canopy of an F-80 can be opened in flight up to about 220 MPH. So
I opened the canopy and upholstered my G.I. Issue Colt M1911 .45
automatic.

Now, liquid fuel will not burn, at least not like vapors, so I aimed
for the part of the tank I was sure would be full of liquid. Firing
my first shot, I had no idea where the bullet went--perhaps airborne,
high-speed physics were at work, or maybe just my nerves. But my next
three shots punctured the tank, passing through the fuel and exiting
cleanly out the far side of the 24" wide tank.

For the next thirty minutes, I flew with the left wing down in a
series of circles to drain the fuel and slowly return to base. By the
time I got to the airstrip the tank was empty. I made a routine
landing. As far as I know, I am the only pilot in the Air Force who
ever shot his own plane to correct a malfunction.
Thank goodness for my .45.

Lt.Col. A.J. D'Amario, USAF Ret. Florida
 
Imagine the same guy crawling on the wing to stab the tank because Oh ####, I left My service pistol in my locker...
Sorry - no pictures

By LtCol. A.J. D'Amario USAF Ret. From the pages of the American
Rifleman, November 2013.

On my first solo flight at K-13, Suwan, Korea, in June 1952, I took
off in an F-80 Shooting Star. It was not a combat mission. All I had
to do was go up and have fun boring holes in the sky for about an
hour and a half.

Immediately after takeoff, I felt the left wing was heavy and
determined that the left tip fuel tank was not feeding properly or
not at all. Afraid it might fall off and rupture during landing,
potentially melting asphalt on the runway, the tower would not let me
land with the full tank. I was instructed to make a bomb run and drop
the whole tank.

Arriving at the bomb range, I set up my bomb-release switches to
release the tank. Flying over the impact area, I pushed the button
but nothing happened. I tried a second time and again there was no
response. On my next pass, I tried the manual release handle but to
no avail. Making one final run, I used the button we called the
"panic button" because it allegedly released everything hanging on
the airplane. It worked as advertised and dumped everything, save my
errant left tip tank.

The tower control officer advised me that if I couldn't get rid of
the tank or its contents, I should give them my location, eject and
await pickup.

Well. Pilots really hate to punch out of a perfectly flyable airplane
and I figured I still had one option worth trying.
The canopy of an F-80 can be opened in flight up to about 220 MPH. So
I opened the canopy and upholstered my G.I. Issue Colt M1911 .45
automatic.

Now, liquid fuel will not burn, at least not like vapors, so I aimed
for the part of the tank I was sure would be full of liquid. Firing
my first shot, I had no idea where the bullet went--perhaps airborne,
high-speed physics were at work, or maybe just my nerves. But my next
three shots punctured the tank, passing through the fuel and exiting
cleanly out the far side of the 24" wide tank.

For the next thirty minutes, I flew with the left wing down in a
series of circles to drain the fuel and slowly return to base. By the
time I got to the airstrip the tank was empty. I made a routine
landing. As far as I know, I am the only pilot in the Air Force who
ever shot his own plane to correct a malfunction.
Thank goodness for my .45.

Lt.Col. A.J. D'Amario, USAF Ret. Florida
 
The type in question:

f-80s-misawa015-1.jpg


That's Robin Olds, 1946, who flew for the USAF in three wars, finishing up in Vietnam as an F4 jock. To stay on topic, here he is during his first war:

312082_med.jpg


Dude had a huge set, but AFAIK, never shot his own aircraft to solve a problem. That takes MASSIVE balls. :)
 
Still here plink !! Just doing a lot more reading then posting :) thanks to the guys that post pics on a regular basis, and thanks to the guys that respond on said pics, this thread ( and forum ) is full of very knowledgable people and I think everyone has learned at least one thing they didn't know. :) I know I have !!
Cheers
Joe

:cheers: Hey Joe, I think this maybe the longest running thread on CGN!...Trolls must be busy elsewhere!? :p
 
Dammit, Ernie, watch where you're pointing that thing!


Oh, ja. Like the grease gun wasn't inaccurate enough already. Somebody in Ordnance probably figured, "What the hell, we can't hit anything with the straight barrel, let's try it
the German way."

What's that thing on the end of the chain? Some kind of martial arts mace for CQB? "Yeah, that's right...you c'mon at me with that bayonet, Jerry, and I'll clobber you from where you least expect it!"
And look at the direction the barrel is pointed. Wouldn't it have been better aimed to one side? They could've made left shooters and right shooters,
even anti-aircraft shooters...anything would've been better than one aimed at the ground!
(Despite it's early promise for a quick end to the war in Europe, production ceased as the frequency of shooters' foot wounds drastically increased)
 
Is that finger your "safety"??


"Hey, officer boy--Get your finger out of that trigger guard! Sir."

BTW-- Compare the radii of the two barrels--German gun vs the US grease gun. I think that .45 ACP slug will be in for a surprise when it comes to that sharp turn. The German's path is more gentle. Of course, at ~1,000 fps, it may not make any difference...
 


The Krummlauf did work, barely. IIRC it did see limited combat action in urban battles. However it did tend to burn out very quickly.

It was produced in several variants: an "I" version for infantry use, a "P" version for use in tanks (to cover the dead areas in the close range around the tank, to defend against assaulting infantry), versions with 30°, 45°, 60° and 90° bends, a version for the StG 44 and one for the MG 42. Only the 30° "I" version for the StG 44 was produced in any numbers. The bent barrel attachments had very short lifespans – approx. 300 rounds for the 30° version, and 160 rounds for the 45° variant–as the barrel and bullets fired were put under great stress. Another problem besides the short life-span was that the bending caused the bullets to shatter and exit the barrel in multiple fragments, producing an unintended shotgun effect. As a result, weapons designers experimented with small vent holes drilled into the Krummlauf's barrel in order to reduce pressure and recoil, allowing the discharged bullets' built-up gases to be released to slow the bullet's velocity as it turned to exit the barrel. Nevertheless, the Krummlauf's lifespan remained the same. The 30° model was able to achieve a 35x35 cm grouping at 100m

krumlauf.jpg

http://4.bp.########.com/-v6m1deBDNyY/T77zYbfRprI/AAAAAAAAKl0/g_I0tw_alo0/s1600/mp44-4.jpg
1715.jpg


And the Soviets even copied it.
ppsh-45.JPG


And just to prove the theory.
[youtube]BfGsvZg9pJY[/youtube]
[youtube]4xfYfgpjtws[/youtube]

PS. Oh and Sporting Lad, the little chain would be the way they locked the extension onto the M3.
 
Maybe it was conceived to defend against an army whose doctrine was "Don't shoot until you can see the whites of their eyes!"

(comment often heard coming from shooters in the bent gun units):
Hey, am I actually hitting anything out there?? I can't even see what I'm shooting at!
 
A real "swashbuckler"!

Jack Churchill was an interesting chap. They really should have gotten Sean Connery to play him in a biopic.
He was the last British soldier to have killed an enemy with a longbow!
Daring? Yes. Eccentric? Yes. But he was 'the real deal', as far as I know. He was no phoney poseur.
He seems to have had his swash buckled on correctly!
Check out his bio on Wiki. H:S:
 
Back
Top Bottom