make it in 38 spl and I would take one
Hmm.... kind of smells of a scam.
M
Went to http://webleymkvi.com/... "100 Year anniversery model" And under the video (which is excellent), "Video with grateful, acknowledgment..." (unnecessary comma)
If they can't spell (or at least proof-read) their home page, something isn't right. No contact information (aside from the online form to join.) No mention of the expected final price.
A WHOIS search came up with this:
Domain Name: WEBLEYMKVI.COM
Registrar: WEBFUSION LTD.
Sponsoring Registrar IANA ID: 1515
Whois Server: whois.123-reg.co.uk
Referral URL: http://www.123-reg.co.uk
OK, OK, I'm reading too much into this with my tinfoil hat on. Just thought I'd do a little digging.
The sad thing is, if it is legit, they won't be available in Britain. How ironic.![]()
Webley folks, dig out your treasures and a tape. Are the cylinders a tad short for more mainstream chamberings like 38spl or 45 LC?
Just pondering this as it seems like Webleys always seem to be in 38 S & W or 455; both stubby little ' fire hydrant ' looking rounds.
Absolutely right. Mine measures 1.500", as specified in the original drawings.
Figured as much, at 1.55" that's too short. 9mm Luger would be a thought; I'm not sure if Webley would be willing to retool for a more popular modern cartridge. But it would be worth it too run moonclips to get to run ' off the shelf ' 9mm and 45 ACP IMO
Figured as much, at 1.55" that's too short. 9mm Luger would be a thought; I'm not sure if Webley would be willing to retool for a more popular modern cartridge. But it would be worth it too run moonclips to get to run ' off the shelf ' 9mm and 45 ACP IMO
Totally agree with josquin on new Martini's. Maybe a .45/70 and a .32/20 rather than .577/450 and .310 (I do shoot my .310 and .577/450 but ammo is MUCH more problematic than .455).
gary



























