I can't argue with that. I remember watching the video at the time.So yea, my adapter came out Dec 2012.
I can't argue with that. I remember watching the video at the time.So yea, my adapter came out Dec 2012.
I can't argue with that. I remember watching the video at the time.
Red, great idea and work but you made a big mistake in giving him the details. I know you had no intention of mass producing it but you still gave it away.
If 1mlt does have patent (BIG IF) then i guess everyone else is screwed, if he decides to take legal action.
NEVER EVER give your idea to other people, unless your a really nice fellow who only wants to make other people rich.
Redliner, why don't you post the details on how to make the adapter you came up with on cgn. I know we all asked for it in the other thread
Oh this is gonna be good.
When i made my topic about my adapter two and a half years ago and posted it on youtube, Marcus emailed me and asked me how i did the magazine release UNDER the stock. Being helpful i sent a very long and detailed instruction on how to do it, and how i had no plans to mass produce.
Remember boys and girls, up until recently you had to modify the magazines with another mag release hole on their adapter.
Lo and behold a few months after my email back, to which Marcus never responded, another version of the mag comes up, copying the slanted mag release that i came up with.
So for him to come on the very ####ing board that me and a few guys came up with the idea of the canadian legal magazine and wag his finger with his "patent" is pathetic.
Here's the link to the original post.
http://www.canadiangunnutz.com/forum/showthread.php/845857-LEGAL-10-round-SKS-with-detachable-mag-accomplished!
So yea, my adapter came out Dec 2012.
Oh i found Marcuses post on my youtube video
i also have the copy of my email to Marcus about the adapter.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZR45SxabqHA
Date published Dec 3, 2011. So whose came first?
And yes, I asked if you were going to produce it. You said no. We had already designed the G7 the previous year (watch the above video). We were looking to improve it. Ours is very different from yours. The basic bodies don't look the same. Our release is on the right side, rear (it always was). Yours is left front. Our body is 2 pieces. Yours is one. We use a 'locking tab' on the front under the rear sight trunnion. We don't know how yours locks into the rifle. Our adapter can be fitted to any SKS. We don't know if yours can. The differences between the 2 adapters is immense. They are not closely related. Do you recall me saying your adapter "looked very familiar"? The date on the G7 video clearly shows we had one prior to your 2012 date.
We filed 'paperwork' with the USPTO last May. That 'process' is still ongoing.
We started making adapters for the SKS in 2008. Our 1st one was called the G1. We now have the G3, G5 and G9. The G7 was scrapped for the G9. We didn't 'steal' anyones design.
Marcus
We filed 'paperwork' with the USPTO last May. That 'process' is still ongoing.
making something vs having something patented are two very different things. Often getting a patent is substantially more difficult and costly than having an idea and just making something. You can't be angry if someone patented something you think you thought of because you always had the option to patent your idea. Problem is most people don't want to buck up the tens of thousands if not more depending on the complexity to file and successfully complete a claim.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZR45SxabqHA
Date published Dec 3, 2011. So whose came first?
And yes, I asked if you were going to produce it. You said no. We had already designed the G7 the previous year (watch the above video). We were looking to improve it. Ours is very different from yours. The basic bodies don't look the same. Our release is on the right side, rear (it always was). Yours is left front. Our body is 2 pieces. Yours is one. We use a 'locking tab' on the front under the rear sight trunnion. We don't know how yours locks into the rifle. Our adapter can be fitted to any SKS. We don't know if yours can. The differences between the 2 adapters is immense. They are not closely related. Do you recall me saying your adapter "looked very familiar"? The date on the G7 video clearly shows we had one prior to your 2012 date.
We filed 'paperwork' with the USPTO last May. That 'process' is still ongoing.
We started making adapters for the SKS in 2008. Our 1st one was called the G1. We now have the G3, G5 and G9. The G7 was scrapped for the G9. We didn't 'steal' anyones design.
Marcus
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZR45SxabqHA
Date published Dec 3, 2011. So whose came first?
And yes, I asked if you were going to produce it. You said no. We had already designed the G7 the previous year (watch the above video). We were looking to improve it. Ours is very different from yours. The basic bodies don't look the same. Our release is on the right side, rear (it always was). Yours is left front. Our body is 2 pieces. Yours is one. We use a 'locking tab' on the front under the rear sight trunnion. We don't know how yours locks into the rifle. Our adapter can be fitted to any SKS. We don't know if yours can. The differences between the 2 adapters is immense. They are not closely related. Do you recall me saying your adapter "looked very familiar"? The date on the G7 video clearly shows we had one prior to your 2012 date.
We filed 'paperwork' with the USPTO last May. That 'process' is still ongoing.
We started making adapters for the SKS in 2008. Our 1st one was called the G1. We now have the G3, G5 and G9. The G7 was scrapped for the G9. We didn't 'steal' anyones design.
Marcus




























