My wife was bugging me about sending her Rem BDL rifle in for trigger replacement as it falls within the serial no. range affected.
I watched a few videos on the topic and checked her rifle - (A) it doesn't have that set screw in the trigger and (B) it is steel as opposed to aluminum, the material of the alleged problem trigger. I do recall the gentleman that sold it to her mentioning the fact that he had the trigger upgraded, which meant nothing to me at the time.
I've tried to make the rifle fail as reported in the videos and failed to get it to malfunction.
In watching the videos, one stood out; a documentary piece where there was footage of rifles going "Bang!" when the bolt was moved or the safety pushed off. These rifles had been tampered with by Sheriff's departments and NOT submitted for evaluation and testing (by Remington or independent testers) as they knew that work invalidated the warranty.
In the case of the guy that shot his 10 year old son, the rifle was tested and it had rust and debris under the stock and on the trigger group from spending time in a saddle scabbard. It looks like he was making his error someone else's. Same for another incident where it turned out the shooter was handling a loaded gun in the same room as the victim, not in another room as originally reported.
Regardless of any rifle failure, the gun handlers were in error by not pointing the rifles in a safe direction.
I watched a few videos on the topic and checked her rifle - (A) it doesn't have that set screw in the trigger and (B) it is steel as opposed to aluminum, the material of the alleged problem trigger. I do recall the gentleman that sold it to her mentioning the fact that he had the trigger upgraded, which meant nothing to me at the time.
I've tried to make the rifle fail as reported in the videos and failed to get it to malfunction.
In watching the videos, one stood out; a documentary piece where there was footage of rifles going "Bang!" when the bolt was moved or the safety pushed off. These rifles had been tampered with by Sheriff's departments and NOT submitted for evaluation and testing (by Remington or independent testers) as they knew that work invalidated the warranty.
In the case of the guy that shot his 10 year old son, the rifle was tested and it had rust and debris under the stock and on the trigger group from spending time in a saddle scabbard. It looks like he was making his error someone else's. Same for another incident where it turned out the shooter was handling a loaded gun in the same room as the victim, not in another room as originally reported.
Regardless of any rifle failure, the gun handlers were in error by not pointing the rifles in a safe direction.






















































