If you could only own ONE bolt action rifle ? ... not a troll thread

I think the ruger scout in .308. Maybe not that particular rifle, but a quality version of that design. I have heard a few crappy things about them (the new one's anyways) but I love the idea of that little gun.

Believe none of what you hear and half of what you see.

I had to downsize my gun collection last year (for reasons beyond my control), and the scout was my "do-all" bolt action of choice. I haven't regretted it for a second. The bolt is a bit on the sloppy side, and the action was rough until i cycled it about a thousand times, but other than that it's a great gun. It feels way overbuilt, No flimsy plastic here! And deer magically die every time i point it at em.
 
I'm pretty happy with my Sauer 202 classic thus far... Can toss any tube on it I want from 6.5-06 to 9.3x62, built quite nice, compact for a long action, pleasant to shoot as well :)



 
Neither. Just one bolt.

That's a bit difficult. If the law was suddenly changed and I could only have one rifle I would have to sell off all the others. That would leave me with many thousands of dollars to spend on the ultimate rifle. But if it was just a case of being a new guy starting out with limited money and I could only have one rifle it would change what I planned to buy dramatically.

So, if I had to liquidate and go with just one bolt rifle I would have a custom built on a Satterlee or GMA magnum action and likely go with a 375 H&H. If I was new to the game and I lived in One-Rifle-Only-Land then I would probably choose an Model 70 in 375 H&H.

Regardless the 375 (whether you prefer H&H or Ruger is your choice) is the way to go.
 
I'm pretty happy with my Sauer 202 classic thus far... Can toss any tube on it I want from 6.5-06 to 9.3x62, built quite nice, compact for a long action, pleasant to shoot as well :)




Very nice Hotwheels81 !! Would love to own a Sauer 202. Thanks for posting.
 
If i was going to have only one bolt rifle , i would like it to have : laminated stock , no plastics , CRF , iron sights , cerakote finish , integral base , and a nice trigger of course . 3 positions safety and floorplate would be fine.

The Ruger Guide Gun have most of those features...

Until i found my ideal , i will probably rely on my Win70 CRF FWT in 30-06 .
 
That's a bit difficult. If the law was suddenly changed and I could only have one rifle I would have to sell off all the others. That would leave me with many thousands of dollars to spend on the ultimate rifle. But if it was just a case of being a new guy starting out with limited money and I could only have one rifle it would change what I planned to buy dramatically.

So, if I had to liquidate and go with just one bolt rifle I would have a custom built on a Satterlee or GMA magnum action and likely go with a 375 H&H. If I was new to the game and I lived in One-Rifle-Only-Land then I would probably choose an Model 70 in 375 H&H.

Regardless the 375 (whether you prefer H&H or Ruger is your choice) is the way to go.
You will not be able to sell your surplus to anyone as everyone else is selling theirs due to the one-person-one-gun law.
 
Oh no. not another "If there could be only one" thread............

My answer remains the same, mine would be a 340 Wby in a SS mod 700 or mod 70 or Sako L61R (never seen a SS Sako L61R though) in a Brown Precision fiberglass stock and wearing a Zeiss Victory 3.5-10X42. I could and would hunt the entire globe with this rifle and cartridge, including all of Africa's game. Given the very good bullets available today and an appropriate solid I would never feel under gunned nor particularly over gunned with the right bullet and load. This cartridge has the legs for Marco Polo hunting with a 200 gn bullet at over 3200 fps and it has the knock down slam for buffalo with a 275 or 300 gn bullet and I would not even hesitate on elephant with a 300 gn solid at about 2400 fps. The smaller stuff just dies with great aplomb..........And don't tell me they wouldn't let me use a 340 on dangerous game, 'cause the law says minimum .375..........this is all theoretical anyway and from the hunting I've done over there, no one cares WHAT you shoot near as much as how well you shoot it.

You boys and your 308 and 303 pop guns want to go wander around the devil's club and alder thickets of BC's northwest coast or coastal Alaska, be my guest...........or Zambia's Luangwa valley, or Zimbabwe's Zambezi valley, fly at 'er, but these most certainly would not be my cartridges of choice. Gentlemen you must realize there is a whole big world out there with game animals from 6 lbs to 6 tons and the world doesn't end at Ontario's borders. Now I realize that not everyone will explore and hunt all the corners of the planet and in certain locales the 308 or 303 would be more than adequate..........but fantasize a little and say you were maybe going to hunt elsewhere once in a while, like Alaska for a brownie or the high arctic for a white bear or Africa for a buffalo.............Now review your cartridge and rifle choice with these expanded parameters and see what you come up with.
 
Last edited:
Oh no. not another "If there could be only one" thread............

My answer remains the same, mine would be a 340 Wby in a SS mod 700 or mod 70 or Sako L61R (never seen a SS Sako L61R though) in a Brown Precision fiberglass stock and wearing a Zeiss Victory 3.5-10X42. I could and would hunt the entire globe with this rifle and cartridge, including all of Africa's game. Given the very good bullets available today and an appropriate solid I would never feel under gunned nor particularly over gunned with the right bullet and load. This cartridge has the legs for Marco Polo hunting with a 200 gn bullet at over 3200 fps and it has the knock down slam for buffalo with a 275 or 300 gn bullet and I would not even hesitate on elephant with a 300 gn solid at about 2400 fps. The smaller stuff just dies with great aplomb..........And don't tell me they wouldn't let me use a 340 on dangerous game, 'cause the law says minimum .375..........this is all theoretical anyway and from the hunting I've done over there, no one cares WHAT you shoot near as much as how well you shoot it.

You could transfer that same line of thinking to the 375 Wby and sacrifice a smidgen of flatness for a smidgen more omph on the world's largest game (although I have never hunted them and you have.)

I figure a 260 grain AB in a 375 Wby could be pushed to 3000 fps fairly easily which is flat enough plus it opens you up to many more dangerous game bullets.

I guess debating the perfect all around cartridge is somewhat futile given there are several choices depending on one's personal preferences.
 
You could transfer that same line of thinking to the 375 Wby and sacrifice a smidgen of flatness for a smidgen more omph on the world's largest game (although I have never hunted them and you have.)

I figure a 260 grain AB in a 375 Wby could be pushed to 3000 fps fairly easily which is flat enough plus it opens you up to many more dangerous game bullets.

I guess debating the perfect all around cartridge is somewhat futile given there are several choices depending on one's personal preferences.

Cam, a very good case could be made for the 378 Wby, 375 Wby, H&H, RUM or even Ruger, but my thinking is there are many, many more hunting opportunities on blacktail to moose sized animals, even world wide, as opposed to the once or twice in a lifetime elephant, buffalo or rhino hunts. So I would be willing to use the heavy although smaller diameter bullets for these relatively rare occasions and retain the long range capabilities of the 340 for the remainder of the hunting situations, which would make up 99% of one's hunting. This is my rationale and logic, anyway...........With bullets from 160gn, to 300gn one could surely find an appropriate bullet for any critter that wanders the planet.
 
Last edited:
Oh no. not another "If there could be only one" thread............

My answer remains the same, mine would be a 340 Wby in a SS mod 700 or mod 70 or Sako L61R (never seen a SS Sako L61R though) in a Brown Precision fiberglass stock and wearing a Zeiss Victory 3.5-10X42. I could and would hunt the entire globe with this rifle and cartridge, including all of Africa's game. Given the very good bullets available today and an appropriate solid I would never feel under gunned nor particularly over gunned with the right bullet and load. This cartridge has the legs for Marco Polo hunting with a 200 gn bullet at over 3200 fps and it has the knock down slam for buffalo with a 275 or 300 gn bullet and I would not even hesitate on elephant with a 300 gn solid at about 2400 fps. The smaller stuff just dies with great aplomb..........And don't tell me they wouldn't let me use a 340 on dangerous game, 'cause the law says minimum .375..........this is all theoretical anyway and from the hunting I've done over there, no one cares WHAT you shoot near as much as how well you shoot it.

You boys and your 308 and 303 pop guns want to go wander around the devil's club and alder thickets of BC's northwest coast or coastal Alaska, be my guest...........or Zambia's Luangwa valley, or Zimbabwe's Zambezi valley, fly at 'er, but these most certainly would not be my cartridges of choice. Gentlemen you must realize there is a whole big world out there with game animals from 6 lbs to 6 tons and the world doesn't end at Ontario's borders. Now I realize that not everyone will explore and hunt all the corners of the planet and in certain locales the 308 or 303 would be more than adequate..........but fantasize a little and say you were maybe going to hunt elsewhere once in a while, like Alaska for a brownie or the high arctic for a white bear or Africa for a buffalo.............Now review your cartridge and rifle choice with these expanded parameters and see what you come up with.

Should you extend your cartridge choice to having to subsistence hunt for rabbits and marmots, then? :)

My 30-06 makes a messy stew out of smaller critters. Your 340 would make isolated little red dots all over the rocks, dirt and bushes to lick for nourishment! It would be like a death ray in a Japanese cartoon vaporizing a city during an alien invasion.

Cheers! :)
 
Should you extend your cartridge choice to having to subsistence hunt for rabbits and marmots, then? :)

My 30-06 makes a messy stew out of smaller critters. Your 340 would make isolated little red dots all over the rocks, dirt and bushes to lick for nourishment! It would be like a death ray in a Japanese cartoon vaporizing a city during an alien invasion.

Cheers! :)





You sir should invest in the Hammond game getter, I have nothing but good things to say about a 00 buck pellet driven by a #3 cartridge fired from my 30-06...




 
Not to de-rail this excellent thread, but I have found great flexibility in carrying my 30-06 to 32 ACP/32 S&W chamber insert. I can take any small critter I like without meat damage. Not the greatest in accuracy, but it will push my 32 S&W Long's into a 3-4 inch circle at 50 yards.
 
Oh no. not another "If there could be only one" thread............

Gentlemen you must realize there is a whole big world out there with game animals from 6 lbs to 6 tons and the world doesn't end at Ontario's borders...

The world doesn't end at Ontario's border??? Damn it!!! Are you saying that I'm going to have to start obeying the laws of gravity again... ;)
 
Oh no. not another "If there could be only one" thread............

My answer remains the same, mine would be a 340 Wby in a SS mod 700 or mod 70 or Sako L61R (never seen a SS Sako L61R though) in a Brown Precision fiberglass stock and wearing a Zeiss Victory 3.5-10X42. I could and would hunt the entire globe with this rifle and cartridge, including all of Africa's game. Given the very good bullets available today and an appropriate solid I would never feel under gunned nor particularly over gunned with the right bullet and load. This cartridge has the legs for Marco Polo hunting with a 200 gn bullet at over 3200 fps and it has the knock down slam for buffalo with a 275 or 300 gn bullet and I would not even hesitate on elephant with a 300 gn solid at about 2400 fps. The smaller stuff just dies with great aplomb..........And don't tell me they wouldn't let me use a 340 on dangerous game, 'cause the law says minimum .375..........this is all theoretical anyway and from the hunting I've done over there, no one cares WHAT you shoot near as much as how well you shoot it.

You boys and your 308 and 303 pop guns want to go wander around the devil's club and alder thickets of BC's northwest coast or coastal Alaska, be my guest...........or Zambia's Luangwa valley, or Zimbabwe's Zambezi valley, fly at 'er, but these most certainly would not be my cartridges of choice. Gentlemen you must realize there is a whole big world out there with game animals from 6 lbs to 6 tons and the world doesn't end at Ontario's borders. Now I realize that not everyone will explore and hunt all the corners of the planet and in certain locales the 308 or 303 would be more than adequate..........but fantasize a little and say you were maybe going to hunt elsewhere once in a while, like Alaska for a brownie or the high arctic for a white bear or Africa for a buffalo.............Now review your cartridge and rifle choice with these expanded parameters and see what you come up with.

Fair answer c-fbmi, it is something to really consider.

Too big for everything is an issue too. This is why I'm very interested in what people have to say on this topic.. One gun will most certainly not do everything, would never debate. Having said that, there are plenty of places in the world where a man really only can afford one gun no matter what is running around out there and many learn to make it work well. And often in those cases they are lucky to have what they have, very little choice if any for caliber.

We generally have the luxury here to own several and debate all day long, even though I know plenty of guys in Canada who really cannot afford to own and shoot more than one. Luckily I'm not in that category but can certainly contemplate others who are.
 
Back
Top Bottom