165 gr bullets in for 1 in10 twist .308

Bigbubba

CGN Ultra frequent flyer
Rating - 100%
326   0   0
Location
SW Ontario
So my question is, will 165 grain bullets shoot ok in a 1 in 10 rifled barrel.
Would 150 grain be better or worse?
I have absolutely no idea how the twist rate affects bullet stability.
Any thoughts?
 
Generally the longer, heavier bullets require a faster twist rate to stabilize. My WInchester Model 70 in 6.5x55 has a 1 in 7.87" twist rate as the 6.5x55 was originally designed for long 160 gr bullets. The 1 in 7.87" twist also gives good accuracy with 100, 120 and 140 gr bullets too.

My Winchester Model 94 .30-30 has a 1 in 12" twist rate and is accurate with 100, 130, 150 and 170 gr bullets.
 
There's actually a formula for determining best twist rate, based on bullet geometry and weight as well as muzzle velocity. I built an excel sheet that calculates true BC, Miller Stability, and best twist rate. PM me if you'd like me to email it to you.
Cheers!
 
A 165 is the ideal hunting bullet weight for the .308(and .30-06). Kill any game you care to hunt. No arithmetic is required.
 
The equation may be used as follows, where;
MV = Muzzle Velocity
D = Bullet diameter in inches
L = Bullet length in inches

Twist rate = 3.5((MV^0.5)*(D^2))/L

eg:

Twist Rate = 3.5((2560^0.5)*(0.308^2))/L

= 3.5((50.59644)*(0.094864))/L

= 3.5(4.79978)/L

= 16.799233/1.350

= 12.44 (round this number down according to rules)

= 12:1 twist rate

Hope this helps shed some light on the math side of things!

Moot
 
Last edited:
formula is:
MV = Muzzle Nelocity
D = Bullet diameter in inches
L = Bullet length in inches
3.5 * ((MV^0.5)*(D^2))/L

eg: 3.5((2560^0.5)*(0.308^2))/1.350

= 3.5((50.596)*(0.094864))/1.350

= 3.5(4.799739)/1.350

= 16.7991/1.35

= 12.44 (round this number down)

= 12:1 twist rate

hope this sheds a little light on the mathematical side of things!

Moot
 
I've found that powder seems to make a difference too. I know it sounds strange! I used these loads:

Winchester 760; 45.5 grains - 2553 MV; produce sub MOA groups at 100 meters

IMR 4064 ; 41.1 grains - 2548 MV; I couldn't get this load to group to save my life. No idea why!

I loaded another lot with W760, lo and behold! Nice tight groups!

Food for thought!

Moot
 
I've found that powder seems to make a difference too. I know it sounds strange! I used these loads:

Winchester 760; 45.5 grains - 2553 MV; produce sub MOA groups at 100 meters

IMR 4064 ; 41.1 grains - 2548 MV; I couldn't get this load to group to save my life. No idea why!

I loaded another lot with W760, lo and behold! Nice tight groups!

Food for thought!

Moot

Very odd...with 168 smk's mine grouped ok with 4064 but was terrible with varget 1:10 twist, 3031 seems like a good test candidate as well
 
So my question is, will 165 grain bullets shoot ok in a 1 in 10 rifled barrel.
Would 150 grain be better or worse?
I have absolutely no idea how the twist rate affects bullet stability.
Any thoughts?

Nothing unusual in that experience at all.

My thoughts are that there is no way to tell on the internet. There is only one way to be sure your gun will shoot your chosen load with the accuracy you want, and that is to try it. Every rifle is a unique individual, and some will shoot a particular bullet/powder combination well, and another rifle of the same make and model may not. Asking on the internet will get you nowhere. Buy some bullets of various types, select a couple of powders, and then start testing.
 
165gr Sierra Game Kings (SPBT,HPBT) are my go to bullets for my dads Savage 110 Trophy hunter in .308. IT will shoot 3/4" groups all day @ 200yrds with 42.5gr of Benchmark in a Remington Case and set off by a CCI BR2 primer.
165 Hornady SST are my good friends GO-TO for his 300 Win mag with a 1-10 twist..
My gunsmith told me a 1-10 twist is the best rate of twist if u plan on hunting with 30 cal. a 165 comes in with just as much energy as a 180 and more then a 150. No Deer, Bear or Moose will tell the difference. But from my experience the 165 always had the accuracy nod.
 
Back
Top Bottom