awinchester85
Member
- Location
- Victoria BC
Is the 91/30 much more accurate then the M38? (for deer hunting)
Go with the m38 it's just more practical it's not a tack driver but it doesn't need to be for deer
^^^Nothing wrong with that at ALL.
That's some good shooting with a 91/30 and surplus ammo(I'm assuming 100 yds). Do you know what it will do with hunting ammo?
You will find as much variance between examples of Mosin-Nagant rifles of the same model, as you will across models. There are so many of these around in states from battlefield pick-ups to captured re-furbs to arsenal re-furbs to barely issued. And they've been used for sporting conversions for almost as long as they've been built, so who knows what modifications we're talking about.
Bore and chamber condition, crown damage, and especially stock bedding are going to affect the results more than which model year we're talking about.
On level terms, yes the longer gun has a longer sight radius, and the carbine fireball we all enjoy so much is merely powder wasted in a short barrel; the M91/30 has the potential to be more accurate over longer ranges.
I'd take the M38 deer stalking, provided I proved its ability on the range and sighted it in. But I *have* taken the M91/30 Sniper. You going to use the iron sights?
thanks, I think I will keep my M38 and tune it up for a future hunt. I was considering selling it and getting the cheaper 91/30 but the fire balls are just too much fun. Not sure yet if I will be using the iron sights. I am thinking about mounting an SVT 40 muzzle break if it is possible.. Next thread...