NEA Issues *WARNING*

Status
Not open for further replies.
If you are looking at 62x39 might I suggest a csa or a cz instead?

I am actually looking for a 5.56 version cause the 7.63x39 versions seems kind of a compromised design. I started looking around for all these great deals on US made lower end ars and its seems everybody is sold out of basic m4 style rifles for under $1300. Looks like the falling dollar has taken its toll.

Are the NEA 5.56 versions that bad?
 
Are the NEA 5.56 versions that bad?

Maybe. Maybe not. It really is a gamble. Some people (supposedly) buy them and never have any problems (although it's often "my gun has been 100%....AFTER I did this this and that to it). *shrugs*


For a little more money, you can buy a much better quality AR.
 
I had one, sold it, but shouldn't have. It ran and grouped great. My only issue would be a suggestion to raise the price $100 and use that money to have a smother bead blasting and a nice anodizing inside and out, not only the outside of the receiver. Such a small thing would definitely improve perception of the product.
 
My pdw has about 3k of commie ammo through it.
Last range time, the gas tube literally sheared off. Part of it still pinned to the gas tube. NEA sending me new gas tube and block. Mine is first gen. Gas tubes were sourced overseas originally but now is sourced locally. Although I continue to question the quality control of the original rifles I am content with their customer services. I do believe in companies taking customer feedback, internalizing it, then iteratively make improvements.
 
I am actually looking for a 5.56 version cause the 7.63x39 versions seems kind of a compromised design. I started looking around for all these great deals on US made lower end ars and its seems everybody is sold out of basic m4 style rifles for under $1300. Looks like the falling dollar has taken its toll.

Are the NEA 5.56 versions that bad?

If you want to gamble on a gun that may or may not work why not save the money and buy a norinco m4 or a dominion da556?
 
If you want to gamble on a gun that may or may not work why not save the money and buy a norinco m4 or a dominion da556?

A better option these days is to stay away from the Norinco garbage and buy a Windham Weaponry AR, I saw one brand new for under $700 yesterday when I was bouncing around our site sponsor websites looking for Black Friday deals. Core also appear to build a quality AR as well for another option under $1000.
 
Bought mine over a yr ago; a 14.5"
It's been great. Not one failure.
I'm happy.

Another one of those ehh!! I bought the gun a year ago fired 100 rounds since and it functions flawlessly, when you have fired 500 to 800 rounds in one day than i believe you otherwise NEA is a POS gun , first one lasted a bit over 1000 rounds and the second one "GEN 2" a bit over 500. My norinco has outlasted all of my guns 8k 5.56 and 5k .22lr in 5 years
 
A better option these days is to stay away from the Norinco garbage and buy a Windham Weaponry AR, I saw one brand new for under $700 yesterday when I was bouncing around our site sponsor websites looking for Black Friday deals. Core also appear to build a quality AR as well for another option under $1000.

You get a thumbs up from me for that one. I decided that the WW would be my first AR-15 and have been nothing but happy with it. It may cost more than some Communist made garbage but it costs less than NEA, shoots pretty damned well and I never hear of the same problems that many NEA owners have. Not even the CF versions of WW have prompted complaints.

I can't speak to Core but I've heard nothing but positive comments from their owners. I almost bit on one a few months back and may yet still.

Either way, I support Canadian companies whose costumer service isn't praised because they capably deal with a constant stream of issues. I swear, the Stockholm syndrome of some people in this thread is amazing to me: Their rifles fail, they admit that the firearm was flawed, but it's cool because NEA fixed it for you.
 
Another one of those ehh!! I bought the gun a year ago fired 100 rounds since and it functions flawlessly, when you have fired 500 to 800 rounds in one day than i believe you otherwise NEA is a POS gun , first one lasted a bit over 1000 rounds and the second one "GEN 2" a bit over 500. My norinco has outlasted all of my guns 8k 5.56 and 5k .22lr in 5 years

I don't like to offer much opinion on NEA because I did do business with them a couple of years ago.

But I have an early 12.5" with roughly 3200 rounds through it, and it has not lived an easy life. Just prior to hitting the 3000 mark, the bolt failed to lock back on an empty mag when in an odd position, which was the first failure. I checked the bolt catch, and it was loose, so I figured the spring had broken and I ordered a new one.

When the new spring arrived (with a bunch of other stuff I was buying) I tapped out the roll pin, and realized that there was so much clay-mud caked inside the spring hole that it was jammed in a compressed state. Like I said, this gun has not had an easy life.

I cleaned it out with a pick, and put it back together. It's had a couple hundred rounds since then and it's fine.

I'm not going to say NEA hasn't had some serious issues, and I'm also not going to say that they haven't made some terrible choices in regards to suppliers, workmanship, and frankly ethics. I don't blame the people who are never going to forgive them. I understand perfectly the argument that there are guys like Paul Buffoni out there, who you could give your money to instead (I also did that).

BUT: if you have an NEA that doesn't work, they will sort you out. I do think they've improved a lot - they sell more guns than most people here would ever guess, by a long shot, to customers most here would never suspect, and while the owner is a bit of a nut (I think he would agree with this) he's also a guy who's committed his life to this stuff and he employs a bunch of people, in Canada, building guns.


I think it's really unfortunate that things happened the way they did, particularly in the beginning, because NEA's reputation on CGN at least is pretty much unfixable. And that's largely their own doing (I'm certain the owner would agree with this). But for all their faults, they're better people, building better guns, than this forum realizes. And the work they do internationally is pretty commendable, although also totally unknown by the Canadian shooting public.

Someday I will tell the whole story in print. It's a pretty good story.
 
After going through 60 pages and other threads I'm seeing a lot of broken bolts. As much as I'd like to have a 7.62x39 upper, two things stand out clearly.
NEA hasn't figured it out yet and the 7.62x39 cartridge in standard AR 15's is troublesome.
I'm certainly not ready anytime soon to plunk down good money on upper and bolt until that has been totally beefed up. A piston style upper to handle corrosive would be ideal.
 
After going through 60 pages and other threads I'm seeing a lot of broken bolts. As much as I'd like to have a 7.62x39 upper, two things stand out clearly.
NEA hasn't figured it out yet and the 7.62x39 cartridge in standard AR 15's is troublesome.
I'm certainly not ready anytime soon to plunk down good money on upper and bolt until that has been totally beefed up. A piston style upper to handle corrosive would be ideal.

The bolt failures NEA used to have with their older rifles was caused by a poor quality 223/5.56 bolt they outsourced through another company, they switched suppliers and haven't had those problems since.
The problems with x39 bolts in AR's failing has nothing to do with NEA and happens to all brands eventually, the AR bolt face needs to be opened up for the x39 case head and it doesn't leave a lot of material behind which makes them weak and they will eventually fail. I wouldn't let that stop you from going with a x39 AR but I would stock a spare bolt in your rangebag no matter what brand you go with.
CMMG has gotten around this with their Mutant rifle that uses a proprietary BCG which is somewhere in between an AR-15 and AR-10 size BCG which allows them to make the bolt strong enough to survive.

https://shopquestar.com/shopping65/shopexd.asp?id=2615&bc=no

If anyone wants a x39 AR then I think this is the best option available.
 
...The problems with x39 bolts in AR's failing has nothing to do with NEA and happens to all brands eventually, the AR bolt face needs to be opened up for the x39 case head and it doesn't leave a lot of material behind which makes them weak and they will eventually fail. I wouldn't let that stop you from going with a x39 AR but I would stock a spare bolt in your rangebag no matter what brand you go with.
CMMG has gotten around this with their Mutant rifle that uses a proprietary BCG which is somewhere in between an AR-15 and AR-10 size BCG which allows them to make the bolt strong enough to survive.

https://shopquestar.com/shopping65/shopexd.asp?id=2615&bc=no

If anyone wants a x39 AR then I think this is the best option available.
Exactly what I meant about 7.62x39 uppers on an AR15. :)
 
This saga is finally coming to an end.

My retailer will provide me with a brand new quality AR made by Hera Arms.

My old NEA is heading to be scrapped/shredded, I will not miss it..

My retailer has had really hard time with NEA rifles in general, several rifles are in the same condition as mine is.
To top this off, NEA hasn't provided my retailer any monetary compensation for these broken rifles.

I'm glad to get rid of this sorry excuse of an AR

Finally received the NEA replacement rifle, made by Hera Arms!

As a little side note, NEA customer service is no longer responding to my(or my dealer's) messages.
So much for the great NEA CS.
 
Maybe if we ever get details on the NEA story it would help with recovering their word / brand. I had some NEA rifles I sold off, but I do plan on getting them again the future. *shrugs*
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom