Canadians who fought with the Mac-Pap Battalion in Spain could see the writing on the wall and the rise of Fascism that threatened European stability.
And sadly they were treated like scum on their return to Canada.
Canadians who fought with the Mac-Pap Battalion in Spain could see the writing on the wall and the rise of Fascism that threatened European stability.
For nothing? How about to stop the spread of Fascism around the world and the annihilation of the Jewish race from Europe?
I was peripherally involved in a similar discussion about the ability of aluminumed hulled warships to handle hits and fires some time ago. Someone brought up that an inquiry was held in Britian to address the apparent tendancy of RN ships not to take damage well. The inquiry found that these concerns were unwarranted. So, is this issue real, or a cover-up?
![]()
Female Snipers of the 3rd Shock Army, 1st Belorussian Front - 775 confirmed kills in one photograph
![]()
Female Snipers of the 3rd Shock Army, 1st Belorussian Front - 775 confirmed kills in one photograph
There are two issues - the ability to take damage and the ability to withstand fire.
The first issue, as it relates to aluminum, is a myth. (And although attributed to the Falklands war, it is entirely misguided.) The Royal Navy's Type 21 frigate HMS Ardent is often put forward as an example of a warship (of aluminum construction) that could take a hit. 9 bomb hits to be exact (two of which failed to explode), and she stayed alive for several hours. The larger Type 42 destroyer HMS Sheffield, meanwhile, an entirely steel ship, succumbed after a single Exocet missile hit.
The second issue, the ability to withstand fire, holds more water. (No pun intended.) A fire in 1977 aboard the HMS Amazon (sister ship to Ardent earlier mentioned) warped the aluminum ladders aboard ship, complicating firefighting and escape. The collision and fire aboard the US Navy cruiser USS Belknap in 1975, which completely gutted her aluminum superstructure, also brought the issue to the forefront.
Subsequent warship construction began to see a switch toward steel wherever possible/feasible. The Arleigh Burke class Aegis destroyers, for example, are often touted for their heavy use of steel, and ability to take damage, but even these use aluminum in their topside mast structures (to save weight).
Interesting--so it'd be safe to say that warships now are mostly steel?
Our tribal class are aluminum are they not?
I don't know the tribal class but it was quite common practice to use aluminum in warship superstructures up to the Falklands war. If I remember correctly 5 British ships were severely damaged due to aluminum fires from what would otherwise have been relatively minor damage. Long time ago now so my memory is a bit hazy.
Patton once said " We have fought the wrong enemy". Communism was a bigger concern to him than the NAZIS. History is written in the eyes of the Victor. If you do a little more digging about the truth of WWII, It can really open your mind to a better understanding.
For nothing? How about to stop the spread of Fascism around the world and the annihilation of the Jewish race from Europe?
Total load of ignorant bulls**t. This is NOT where the EVIDENCE lays.
Never ceases to amaze me how people swallow all the lies without investigating.
Be what it may, the Germanic leaders sure ' Jumped the shark ' with the concentration camps and their attempt at genocide.
Pretty tough to put a good shine on that.