- Location
- Quebec city
You would want the Lynx mounts, the new handle and a leupolds compact. It would be low - the way it should be.
These rifles look great, but I usually prefer scopes a few mils off the barrel. This stuff is all way too high for my liking.
I'd love to own a 527 in x39 though.
Thanks chief. Good thing you corrected my terminology - as nobody knew what I was talking about.
You should contact leupold, Swarovski and pretty much every other manufacturer that has a scope diagram, and correct them.It was painful, I had to say something...
You should contact leupold, Swarovski and pretty much every other manufacturer that has a scope diagram, and correct them.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Warne doesn't make low rings for the cz527. You need to get a new low profile bolt handle and choose a scope that doesn't have a huge power change ring/eye piece. Warne mediums (the lowest warne makes) with a fairly large power change ring/eye piece (Burris) clears my new handle by 3/16 - 1/4". Lynx brand makes the lowest mounts I found (0.355") and I can run a leupold compact without issues.
Double G, do you think a fixed FX 6X36 Leupold would work with the Lynx low rings? My lefty rifle has the new bolt handle. The regular CZ rings are far too high.
Edit: changed scope model to correct one.
I managed to get a Swarovski Z5 52mm about the thickness of a piece of paper off the barrel on my 527, but I had to remove some serious metal from the bolt handle. A 40mm objective will never hug the barrel on a 527.
![]()
I've been trolling this morning and found this old post. What type of stock is this? Also, how can I tell if I have a modified bolt on my 527?




























