You guys are really taking these tests seriously??
It is what it is. It shows how the gun performs under those conditions
You guys are really taking these tests seriously??
Have they not done a 1911?
They've all been 9, so I don't know if MAC will go to .45. If they do a 1911 in 9, the 1911 crowd will call fowl. Also, since 1911s aren't single manufacturer and are not to a single spec, you're going to have arguments of "Well, MY Les Brown Combat Hawk Super Deluxe with the Spinning Rims can be dragged though a mile of lava and never skip a beat." I suppose the Colt O1970A1CS is closest current production to original M1911A1, though.
Pour sand into your car engine and see how it runs. I get the fact wars are fought in desert environments but the vast majority of handguns aren't used fighting wars. The Shadow2 is a purpose built pistol to shoot IPSC. I have never shot an IPSC match where pressing sand into the gun was part of the match. What is the likelihood of an urban Police Officer ever placing his gun in a sand/mud/water environment? The test is meaningless in 99.9 % of the real world uses for pistols. Glad the pistol this guy promotes sails through it with flying colours. Wonderful. In many ways the market will drive my purchases along with need, budget and purpose.
Build a 1911 loose enough and it will pass this test. Build the same design to shoot 1" groups at 50 yards a,d it likely won't. I suspect most who read this thread have figured the above out. I thought I might chime in on the off chance some don't.
Take Care
Bob



























