I agree that the 1911 is the way to go - but I do not agree with the suggestions to go with Norinco. They are a sad introduction to what is the finest pistol platform available. I see Rickster66 offered you a range meet-up. Best possible opportunity.
Try what you can. You don't need a $4000 gun - but you don't want a $400 gun either.
Enjoy the journey.
Rob!
There is no comparison between the P220 and a 1911. They are two different pistols that serve two different purposes and are distinguished by the trigger and related safeties.
The P220 is better suited as a duty gun because of the decocker, the da/sa trigger. You want this on your hip if you are a cop that rarely needs to rapidly draw and fire.
The 1911 has a vastly superior trigger but is sa only. Makes it a little less foot/thigh friendly on a draw.
I also find the P220 barrel axis is higher thus more flippy than a 1911. The 1911 is a better target/range gun.
My 2 cents. Love both and will never sell either, but they are differwnt beats.
I would get a Colt, Dan Wesson, or Springfield.
I would pass on the STI 1911s in .45 primarily because of the ramped barrel. For .45 1911s, a properly built gun with a conventional barrel will actually feed better. Ramped barrels are best suited to other calibres. The secondary reason I don't care for the STI 1911s are their garish slide markings.
For a non-1911 .45, my first choice would be an M&P 45, but I don't see a compelling reason to shoot .45 other than to feed 1911s.
Ramped barrel has more to do with support, than feeding for higher pressure loads.
STI Trojan is well worth the money, the last 3 years Freedom Ventures has had great black friday sales on them. Lowest prices I've seen (also when I bought mine).
I also have an M&P 45 FDE, I like it, but found it hard to grip when sweating, but a little grip tape solved that. The reset was definitely hard to feel originally, since then I have done the 'burwell' trigger job (just google it) and it has much much much improved. As a side note, apparently the filing of the sear can/does affect the hardening, and if you area very high volume shooter, can need replacement in the future.
Honestly, while I do enjoy shooting the M&P, it barely see's any time, as I am always spending time practicing with my 1911.
As a side note, I also own an older stainless STI ranger II (from earlier 2000's, non ramped barrel, but still bull), and I do love shooting it as well, but I prefer the fibre optic of my Trojan.
after reading the many replies, i will get a 1911. just hesitating between the sig and the kimber for now i guess



























