i believe they use the xcr pistol mags and I believe that makes them legal . Other than 5 extra round I don't see any advantage .I see quite a few ads offering conversion kits for fitting 10 round pistol mags to SKS rifles, is that legal, and what would be the advantages, other than 5 more rounds between fill-ups ?
There are no questions of legality. Pistol magazines may legally contain 10 rounds of the ammunition of which they were designed for. Thus, 10 round XCR pistol magazines are not prohibited devices. How you use them is not regulated. It doesn't matter if you shove them in a rifle, or shove them up anything else, they aren't and won't become prohibited devices.
Furthermore, large retailers wouldn't be importing and selling them, risking their license and reputation, if there were any obvious legal issues with these items. That ought to be common sense.
What is your deal man, it has been explained and in detail that under the law it is legal... posts/threads like these make me wonder what kind of motive a poster would have to create such an issue. Then I remember it's before 7am and I've been up all night, and remove my tinfoil hat... some people.
Common sense is not so common.
However, when we stick them in an SKS, the SKS is no longer in compliance; or else, they would not have pinned mags before the are released for sale. If you had an SKS, with one of those magazines in it, I suspect that when stopped by a cop or a Game Warden; we would have a lot of explaining to do, and they would likely not buy the explanation. Let lawyers sort this out. Such questions are above my pay grade, and were I in jail, my pay-grade would be much lower than it is now.
After much searching, I concede my error; I find it hard to believe after the 10-22 mag business, that they have not closed this loop hole: http://www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/cfp-pcaf/bulletins/bus-ent/20110323-72-eng.htm
Please forgive my ignorance and pigheadedness; I'm old.
After much searching, I concede my error; I find it hard to believe after the 10-22 mag business, that they have not closed this loop hole: http://www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/cfp-pcaf/bulletins/bus-ent/20110323-72-eng.htm
Please forgive my ignorance and pigheadedness; I'm old.
If nothing else, understand one important thing; It's not a loophole, it's written law.
Age is no excuse.
Until it's closed with an amended law, or a regulation under the act.
Old equals experience; in other sectors I have seen just such a thing occur where acts did not change, but arbitrary regulations set by bureaucrats in a government agency decide they need more control over something. Remember, I was shooting back when 30 shot banana-clips were fine on Mini-14's and on ARs that were non restricted. Rarely do we see deregulation, except when the government can no longer afford to regulate and/or such regulation no longer garners votes. Of late, on a Provincial level, such regulatory stuff is being handed off to private or professional agencies, and it is user pay. Presently, over regulation of firearms = votes for the present powers that be. They could sell that one to Toronto by stating that it reduces the potential number of victims by 5 before reloading.
Old doesn't equal experience. A 26 year old who got a drivers licence at 16 and has 10 years of driving under their belt; has more experience than a 55 year old who got their license at 53.