If I had a dollar for every time I read "is there a 223/556 version coming?" I would have enough to buy 2 of these.
That muzzle brake is hideous though, I'm not one to modify a firearm too much but that's gonna go day one.
I must say I am surprised no local boys have taken photos or video of the display rifle yet.![]()
How is it hideous? It looks pretty nice to me.
How is it hideous? It looks pretty nice to me.
I think it looks pretty decent and I'm curious about the threads on the base of it. It was never officially mentioned as a feature but does it accept the NEA brake shield? I think it's definitely way better looking than the chunky one on the NEA 25 to my eye.
having swapable uppers is a pretty big feature of having an "AR"
i'd appreciate a comment on this
I replied to your comment. See above. Best you contact NEA directly.
Hopefully there is a plain muzzle cap that will fit the threads available. I am not a brake fan at all, and wouldn't want one on a 8# .308 rifle.
having swapable uppers is a pretty big feature of having an "AR"
i'd appreciate a comment on this
Then put a flash hider on it? You know brakes are not the only muzzle device right? But yeah one could get a 5/8x24 thread protector.
Yup it accepts the brake shieldI can't find anywhere that sells it separately from the brake though....
Yes I would be interested in the shield as well. Other than deflecting the noise what is the effect on recoil suppression with the shield on? I have no experience with the shields. Until this thread I actually was not aware of them
Yes it is but this isn't an ar
All hold off till I see the range reports.
Yes it is but this isn't an ar
I put "AR" in quotes to convey that the 102 isn't technically an "AR", but it shares the modularity functionality of an AR.
It should be made clear if or when additional components will be available to take advantage of this function. Is that too much to ask?