Run your opinion past the SFSS.
If past history is anything to go by, they probably already know. Big brother indeed.
Run your opinion past the SFSS.
Nope. You can do what ever you want to it, is still an sks magazine whether it's welded or not, your modifications don't alter what it is. Even if you made your own magazine, It'd still for a semi auto sks reciever according to powers that be. What's going on beyond the receiver doesn't matter in regards to magazine laws. No frt for strait pull sksThe magazine itself is a prohibited device if it can hold more than 5 rounds. Although it is not detachable in the sense that a modern magazine is, you can take the rifle apart and move the magazine to an ordinary unmodified SKS.
Maybe if you weld the modified magazine to the receiver of your bolt-action SKS, in a very permanent fashion (not just tacked on, but as permanently as you can), you'd be okay. In that case it would be difficult to argue that it fits a regular SKS. Even better would be to make your own magazine. Maybe you could use the "door" part that opens, and remake the actual part that holds the cartridges. Then it's a home-made magazine specifically designed for a bolt-action rifle.
The gun may be a bolt action rifle. The magazine was made for an autoloader. Just because the rifle is now manually operated, this does not mean that the original SKS magazine is now a bolt action rifle magazine.
Run your opinion past the SFSS. You have no doubt had dealings with them in the past.
I'd be concerned about welding on the bolt, even tig. In would have just made a 2 piece clamp on adapter to extend the bolt handle.
Watchout, I think I just heard the black helicopters go buy, they should be at your place soon. In all seriousness, if/ you run into an Leo while using that you will have bought yourself a one way ticket to jail.
The key element to your thought process is aftermarket 30 shot "removable" magazine and it would not be advisable to modify, however (and let's be clear here, we are doing the same as the authorities would do and that is interpret the writing of the law) a fixed magazine is part of the gun and in my opinion (and my opinion goes back more than 4 decades when John and I founded Marstar in Hawkesbury) the gun is now legally a bolt action rifle.
Been tried, and as mentioned does not fly with the law.
Probably nothing to brag about being affiliated with disgraced dealer Marstar btw, not going to help your reputation.
what did marstar do to get disgraced?
Been tried, and as mentioned does not fly with the law.
Probably nothing to brag about being affiliated with disgraced dealer Marstar btw, not going to help your reputation.
Funny how one comment about maybe removing the restrictive pin would generate more argument than the actual modifications to the entire gun to convert it to bolt action use.