The only issue eotech ever had was a point of impact shift during extreme heat or cold fluctuations, something akin to that.
90% of Canadian shooters who lost their sh!t over it, did so rather foolishly if you take you're rifle out a handful of times during "optimal weather conditions" like most average shooters.
There's never been a question regarding their durability or longevity.
It's like someone saying "id never buy a Glock because it doesn't shoot after it's been buried in the mud!" yet they white glove the living hell out of their firearms.
As for the astigmatism issue, I'll leave that to someone who has experience regarding that.
Absolutely incorrect.
Eotech sights suffer from multiple problems and include thermal drift at all temperatures, the most extreme POI shift is experienced at extreme temps on both ends of the scale.
Eotech sights fail to return to zero after experiencing any temperature changes.
Eotech sights suffer from parallax error in colder temperatures.
Eotech sights suffer from inconsistent click values for adjustment.
Eotech sights suffer from moisture incursion which causes reticle fade or dimming, the sights are not water proof.
Eotech sights suffer from parasitic battery drain for unknown reasons.(not in the case file but a known problem)
These issue are laid out in the litigation documents filed by the US gov against L3 communications/Eotech.
http://www.eotechlawsuit.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/EOTechOrder.pdf
More source information about Eotech's known issues.
http://www.bluesheepdog.com/2015/12/07/eotech-in-trouble/
EOTech's are great. I run an XPS. Never had an issue really. I've left it in the extremely hot cab of my truck and no shift. I've also taken it out in -40 and no shift. I have it co-witnissed with my iron sights. Never noticed any shifts, and it hits (usually) where I point it. Nice and durable too. My rifle has seen more than its fair share of tumbles (I'm not just a bench queen) and its survived things other sights wouldn't. Given the hysteria over the POI shift that 95% of shooters will never in their life experience, you can get them second hand at pretty good prices too. I plan on getting one or two more for my other rifles.
I don't suffer from any vision problems, so I can't speak on any potential issues with glasses or what have you.
Your one off experience somehow does not trump the testing done by Naval Special Warfare Crane division, the FBI or Eotech themselves. All came to the same conclusion, the sights are defective on multiple accounts and there is no remedy. Hence the very large settlement Eotech/L3 paid to the US gov as well as the many thousands of refunds they issued to anyone who bought a sight between 2006 and 2016.
The purpose of using a red dot is faster in acquisition of your target without having obtain a proper cheek weld, if you have to look through your irons with your red dot that defeats all the advantage of having a red dot, you might as well get a scope at that point.
Without having to align the rear sight with the front sight, looking through the rear aperture to locate the reddot is still faster than irons.
Correct, this is not useful for close range applications as you don't need a perfectly round 1moa dot. But for long distances being able to sharpen up that 1moa dot is key.
Reddot sights are not designed for long distance shooting. The 1 MOA dot is not overly useful on a non magnified optic.