Bassmaster
CGN frequent flyer
- Location
- WMU 48 - Whitetail country
D4064
Yup.........can't beat the price either
D4064
Have loaded thousands with H335 (.16c/rd.) and have seen excellent results.
For cheap general range fodder or impromptu plinking sessions D4198 (.08c/rd.) has been working great for me. Rifle and carbine length gas systems (I've tested thus far).
For those using the D powders, where did you obtain your load data? Given that it seems to perform well from what people are saying, and, it is very economical, I may well get some myself; but, I am interested in knowing about a source for data as well.
Just like they say, you use the same powder number (IMR4064 for D4064), start 10% lower then work up the load. Once satisfied you're happy.
I just wish they made Ditegroup and D110.
This ↑↑↑↑ Set it and forget it.
They do make D700X which is very close to titegroup as far as burn rate goes.... it just doesn't meter quite as nice.
yeah, I know. Decided against it as titegroup isn't really expensive anyway and to have a powder that measure well is worth paying the little extra. For the 4064 though the saving is worth it. The saving is larger and to be honest I haven't found a difference between the D4064 I have and IMR4064. Still working up loads but in the end it seems like it's totally worth it. Cheaper than any rifle powder and no need to buy a truckload to get free shipping.
recently I sat down with a copy of hodgdons data and loaded 5 rds with each suitable powder. I went one grain over min in each and used 55 gr cam-pro. Powders used were imr 4064,3031,4198, cfe223,h335,varget and h4895. Out of a 1:7, 18" nea barrel my best results were with the 4198 and 4064. didn't get speeds.



























