Definetly heard both sides.
There's good people from one and the other side.
Simple analogy.
2 neighbours. Fence down the middle of the property line.
Sometimes, a rogue tree threatening either side of the fence grows out of control.
One or the other neighbour can blame the other and demand the rogue tree to be trimmed, cut down, the problem fixed, ETC.
Or, you can tear down the Fence, the barrier, work together, solve the problem, trim the tree to mutual benefit, and if need be, re-erect the fence. But at the end of the day, mutual cooperation fixed the problem, fences or not.
Pipe dream? Some might say.
Am I a quack? I don't think so.
But growing up old school, a firm handshake and agreement used to go much farther than a document reviewed and overseen by a lawyer. Word was bond. Honour was law.
Since the 2015 election, reconciliation has been a major topic.
I feel however, that its alienated people more than brought them together.
Maybe it's because I grew up in a time where when a fight broke out, it was one on one, and regardless of the winner or loser, it ended up with a beer at the counter afterwards, trading techniques, strategies and ultimately learnings.
Winner or loser in the battle, both sides benefited from the war.
Maybe it's time to look past what's hip, advertised and reported on the CBC and other like minded institutions.
Maybe it's just time to shake hands and work towards mutual benefit, towards a common cause. In this case, maintaining and possibly growing what we love and brings all of us on here together: the passion for hunting and a love of wildlife.
Just my two cents. At the end of the day, no matter how you slice it, our passports say "Canadian".
I would just like to see my babies enjoy my passion as much as I was able too. That's all really.