Not at all. Your strawman argument doesent srand up to even the simplest scrutiny.
I’m in favour of strengthening property rights. Handgun ownership is a property rights issue the same as trespass laws. I’d like to see harsher penalties for all types of trespass, whether it’s prople damaging my crops or thieves stealing my handguns, it’s all the same in my assessment.
But I’ll sit back and let you explain how improving Saskatchewan trespass laws will cause a handgun ban, since you brought it up.
You have the right to control who goes on your property now. The new law does not make that right stronger.
You can have harsher penalties without changing the law. Trespassing is already illegal just raise the fines or stiffen the penalties.
Never said it would CAUSE a handgun ban. Said the logic behind both are the same.
We have to kinds of people that have handguns, those that cause damage and those that don't.
The government wants to make owning a handgun a crime in the belief that those that do harm will stop. We know it will only adversely effect those who do no harm now.
Same as hunting. Two groups, those who cause damage and those who don't.
You want to make everyone who accesses the land guilty of a crime in the belief those who ignore signs and do damage will stop.
When in actuality those hunters that access the land without any harm are the only ones adversely affected.