Picture of the day

Beautiful landing - very smooth. Surprised they didn't put it on the grass to minimize damage.

wheels up on tarmac is always preferable to grass. simply because the weight of the aircraft and it's speed tends to "plow" the ground. The pilot can maintain some control once contact is made, plus they are only removing some paint instead of filling the aircraft with debris. And in the case of the F111 - the arresting gear was on the runway.
 
serbianchetniks.jpg


Members of a Chetnik Detachment of the Yugoslav Army, also known as the Yugoslav Army in the Homeland or The Ravna Gora Movement

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chetniks

my god - Gun Jesus in uniform - Ian from Forgotten Weapons......
 
wheels up on tarmac is always preferable to grass. simply because the weight of the aircraft and it's speed tends to "plow" the ground. The pilot can maintain some control once contact is made, plus they are only removing some paint instead of filling the aircraft with debris. And in the case of the F111 - the arresting gear was on the runway.

That and the fact that there is no guarantee of an even surface on the grass (bringing potential for loss of control, flip or turn-over, etc.)
 
I didn't know F-111s had tail hook.Were Australian examples fitted with them or this is standard package equipment?

The F-111 was originally intended to be flown from USN carriers as well as USAF runways, hence the tail hook . Robert McNamara (Secretary of Defense in the early-mid 60's) was a huge proponent of standardization, especially when it came to combat aircraft for the USN, USMC, and USAF.

Of course, the best known (and AFAIK the only one) plane that served across all three services is the F-4 Phantom II.
 
Looks pretty Frenchie to me.;) The French used to have a convoy escort mission in UNIFIL in Lebanon and used their armored cars for this. Trouble was, the French were the former colonial power in Lebanon and were disliked to the point that they always drew fire. As a result other contingents declined their escorts.:rolleyes:
 
Davy_Crockett_bomb.jpg

The W54 nuclear warhead was used in the man-portable M-388 Davy Crockett projectile. The unusually small size of the warhead is apparent.

Hardtack_II_Socorro_test.jpg

A 1958 test of the XW-54 warhead yielded 6 kilotons
 
I thought the Davy Crockett was a recoiless rifle (jeep mounted) that had a bigger blast radius than the maximum range of the rifle.

Literally, a fatal design flaw.

I dunno, that might be preferable to flying a bomber knowing the airfield you are supposed to return to is probably glass, or sitting in a silo knowing that you will die horribly from starvation if you stay put, or radiation if you leave.
 
Davy_Crockett_bomb.jpg

The W54 nuclear warhead was used in the man-portable M-388 Davy Crockett projectile. The unusually small size of the warhead is apparent.

Hardtack_II_Socorro_test.jpg

A 1958 test of the XW-54 warhead yielded 6 kilotons

I think 6 ‘kilo tons’ (6000 tons!) may have been a marketing brochure claim.... nonetheless it was a pretty potent little ‘billet-doux’
that you wouldnt want to receive.
 
PanhardEBR_FL10_11dujardin1.jpg


IMHO, it seems they are getting ready for a fire mission or target practice.
Note the berm behind the vehicles and no rock/chocks behind the tires, only in front.
Guns fire, vehicles recoil/move up the berm a bit then gravity moves them forward and are stopped by the rocks back into their original firing position.
 
Back
Top Bottom