RCMP to be held accountable for Parliamentary Violations

Anvil109 said:
Severe disciplinary action will be taken....2 weeks off with pay....oh the humanity
Click to expand...

....better give them 5 weeks off....that way they can smoke weed for the first week then have the requisite 28 days "clean" before returning to duty....

:)
 
JeffMan said:
Tlovell,

I hear you. Enjoying freedom will always involve men willing to fight for it (through legal means.)

I think we’ll be able to keep our guns for our lifetime. I think Trudeau would rather see us go extinct by not allowing us to pass our firearms on to our children. That makes me ill.

As we move towards diversity, of everything but ideas, we become a low trust society. A low trust society is full of people who take advantage, game the system, consume resources, understands criminality as a societal issue, and can’t be trusted with firearms.

When Trudeau, or any politician, takes our guns it’ll be admitting that society can’t be trusted anymore. Then only criminals will have guns and they’ll have plenty.

A high trust society is based on morality, community, and a self respect for ones own dignified behavior; think of the Canada your grandfather knew. Sadly, It’s slipping away.

Yikes. I’m rambling.

Edit to add - I have no issue with diversity. I have issues with diversity at any cost. I have issues with not respecting others ideas and becoming violent to those with different ideas then their own.
Click to expand...

I'm not going to wait.
I'm going to crate my guns and ammo up and send them to the RCMP to be destroyed tomorrow.
Why wait? :rolleyes:
 
I’ve taken the time to read this complete thread and find it refreshing to see a thread that is about RCMP wrong doings have a police officer contributing to the thread and is pro “us”. I myself am not pro police but I am respectful to the police as I would be to anyone I see. I treat people based on the person. I think it’s highly commendable that a member of parliament and as I’ve read a retired police officer is taking the RCMP to task for over stepping their powers and not following parliamentary protocols. Unfortunately, we are left with more distrust of those we tell our own young children they should seek out if they are in danger. As we all know there are bad police officers but I believe most are doing their best and have our backs. I also believe it’s those above the rank and file that are pushing the officers act in a way that causes us to mistrust them.
 
Wow. Though..... if we had Stephen Harper still running things? I would actually have some expectation that heads would roll. Seeing as we have Mr. Doofus Extraordinaire running things? I'm a little skeptical.
 
I can see it now “For being in contempt of parliament, your staff Christmas party will charge $1 a drink instead of being free, mwuahahahahah!”
 
nowarningshot said:
Didn't work at Nuremburg.
Click to expand...


So you're suggesting that front line members have any sway in writing and ordering policy to be published?

I'm not ignorant to the whole WW2 nazi issues, but let's hold off and start where appropriate here. We have very senior management that approves this, has some lawyer type write it up, management approves it, it's sent to almost certainly a civilian member or PSE who is told to plop it up on the website. From there you can go find the managers and officers that acted on it, but you're going to have to start at the top, and it's not going to trickle much further down.

I'd love to be involved in making major decisions like this, but believe it or not, this organization many here don't trust, and believes is very secretive and dishonest. Is also get this, secretive and dishonest with us schmoes too.

The snake surely needs it's head cut off. This organization desperately needs oversight, and things like helping create, or being the sole "interpreter" of already interpreted laws is a super dangerous slippery slope.
 
Jon. said:
So you're suggesting that front line members have any sway in writing and ordering policy to be published?

I'm not ignorant to the whole WW2 nazi issues, but let's hold off and start where appropriate here. We have very senior management that approves this, has some lawyer type write it up, management approves it, it's sent to almost certainly a civilian member or PSE who is told to plop it up on the website. From there you can go find the managers and officers that acted on it, but you're going to have to start at the top, and it's not going to trickle much further down.

I'd love to be involved in making major decisions like this, but believe it or not, this organization many here don't trust, and believes is very secretive and dishonest. Is also get this, secretive and dishonest with us schmoes too.

The snake surely needs it's head cut off. This organization desperately needs oversight, and things like helping create, or being the sole "interpreter" of already interpreted laws is a super dangerous slippery slope.
Click to expand...
I would like to see exactly where and how this came to be. The RCMP would not have acted without directions at the highest level, internally or from government. Someone must have given the green light: will we ever know who that person was?
 
TA0502 said:
I can see it now “For being in contempt of parliament, your staff Christmas party will charge $1 a drink instead of being free, mwuahahahahah!”
Click to expand...
no there going to take away there boot polish allowance and doughnut sprinkles.for a month.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom