Refurbished Mosins being sold as UNISSUED/UNFIRED/NEVER ISSUED @ Rangeview AVOID!!

3xactly what I proposed in their original thread. Refund $100 for the solid stocks, and $150 for the laminates. This would mean no one who wanted to just keep their purchase would have to face the expense of shipping, and neither would they.

This is going to become a sticky mess like old Cosmo.
 
Is it possible that they meant 'unissued after refurbishment?' Not to play devil's advocate but the word unissued or never fired could be open to interpretation here.

However... If a customer feels a product was misrepresented the company should make it right, even if that is just allowing the person to return the item so that it can be sold to somebody else.
 
Funny thing here, and i find it fascinating that things didn’t happen that way, is that it could have been simple to avoid the mess. Rangereview could have said "sorry folks we didn’t know". Offer the buyers a choice of partial refund (to match what similar Mosins sell for elsewhere),or full refund if gun is returned. Guns returned then can be sold (with correct description). Maybe some financial loss, but reputation is preserved (or improved).

Or maybe there are details which elude me.

Nope, You have it correct Lou. They said that it isn't their fault that they were told by their supplier that they were Never Issued/Unissued. They claimed both of those descriptions in their advertisement. They told me that they aren't doing anything about it and won't refund money even if the rifles are returned unopened. They should face not only total avoidance by members on here, but I think that they should also be kicked off this forum for this so that they lose all of our collective business.

I'll be calling my CC company tonight when I get home from work.
 
Is it possible that they meant 'unissued after refurbishment?' Not to play devil's advocate but the word unissued or never fired could be open to interpretation here.

However... If a customer feels a product was misrepresented the company should make it right, even if that is just allowing the person to return the item so that it can be sold to somebody else.

Nope, they stated "Never Issued" and "Unissued" Never, means just that, or is that just me thinking that way!?
 
Not to sound rude, and maybe I am naive but do unfired Mosins even exist? Sounds to good to be true to me. They were after all used by a country that lost 25,000,000 people during the war, not to mention all the conflicts by satellite nations post-war. I don’t think anything they made went unused.

My thoughts exactly, They have been refurbs since they came in years ago. Any Mosin with a box and a diagonal slash is a refurb. Laminate stocks were made during the late war period (latter 1943) and many more used as replacement stocks after WWII ended. A Pre-war Mosin in a laminate stock is a refurb. As for the vendor, Well make it right...
 
Not to sound rude, and maybe I am naive but do unfired Mosins even exist? Sounds to good to be true to me. They were after all used by a country that lost 25,000,000 people during the war, not to mention all the conflicts by satellite nations post war. I don’t think anything they made went unused.

Then retailers shouldn't advertise them as unfired unissued.
 
Is it possible that they meant 'unissued after refurbishment?' Not to play devil's advocate but the word unissued or never fired could be open to interpretation here.

However... If a customer feels a product was misrepresented the company should make it right, even if that is just allowing the person to return the item so that it can be sold to somebody else.

Nope. Words have meanings. There is no such thing as "alternative fact". There's truth and there's untruth. Untruth can be either lies or mistakes, and retailers are on the hook for both kinds when selling a product. Whether they are liars or incompetent is irrelevant.
 
I haven't received mine yet, but when I do, I'll be calling VISA.

With all this in mind, id reject the delivery and call my CC.

Nope. Words have meanings. There is no such thing as "alternative fact". There's truth and there's untruth. Untruth can be either lies or mistakes, and retailers are on the hook for both kinds when selling a product. Whether they are liars or incompetent is irrelevant.

But with Trump we live in a post-fact world. Facts don't matter anymore. You can just say whatever you want and claim the fake media is lying when you get corrected.

Sad that Canadian retailers are acting like Trump though...
 
I didn't get ripped off like any of you guys, but I know the feeling and how much it hurts. I support you guys on this and I hope you all call your CC companies and get a fraud claim started.

I know its not much but I left a nice note on their google reviews and I encourage everyone reading this thread to do the same.
 
Last edited:
But with Trump we live in a post-fact world. Facts don't matter anymore. You can just say whatever you want and claim the fake media is lying when you get corrected.

Sad that Canadian retailers are acting like Trump though...

I knew it, I knew it, everything in the whole world is Donald Trump's fault!!

D@m!!!

Ummmm, righhhht!
 
Call Rangeview this morning. As soon as I said I was calling about the unissued rifle his tone changed. Told him my bolt had rust on it and he got a bit upset about people posting their opinions on web sites. He told me all sales final and he was talking to his supplier. I told him that the rifle was not what he advertised and it was fraud. He asked me if I opened the box and if I did he could not do anything anyway all rifles are final sale. I said how elae could I inspect the rifle. He asked if I cleaned of the cosmo. I said how else can I inspect what I had and asked if his buyer looked at any of these. He said then the rifle is altered and he would never take back an altered rifle. That I'm not a gun smith so I can't clean it without altering the rifle.
So called cc company. Told them my story. They said send copies of my receipt with the words unissued on it and take the rifle to an expert and get their opinion on their letterhead stating that the rifle is not as stated and he will process my dispute. He says it sounds like I have an excellent chance on my claim. They have to wait 15 days though.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom