MagnetoSpeed V3 vs Labradar
I recently had the opportunity to test both with the same rifle and handloaded bullet, simply to compare data.
The results are very easy to compare: out of 20 bullets fired with 20 second intervals between each shot, 20 bullets fired with both "velocity readers" set up, reading velocities at the muzzle and the data showed a difference of 2 fps between avg speeds, SD and ES were the same. Easy enough. Is the price of the Labradar worth it? Not in my opinion.
Also to be noted, the MagnetoSpeed V3 does produce a point of impact shift of half an inch at 100 m with my setup and handloaded ammo.
PS: This is not a scientific test, simply comparing both velocity readers from a user point if view.
Bullet tested: 130 gr Norma Golden Target, H4350, CCIBR2, Hornady brass. 2840 fps and a 6.1 SD for 10 shot string.
Rifle: Rem700 5R GII 6.5 Creedmoor, Bushnell 3.5-21x50 DMRII, Nightforce rings and base, Harris bipod and HS Precision stock (bedded).
Hope this helps.
I recently had the opportunity to test both with the same rifle and handloaded bullet, simply to compare data.
The results are very easy to compare: out of 20 bullets fired with 20 second intervals between each shot, 20 bullets fired with both "velocity readers" set up, reading velocities at the muzzle and the data showed a difference of 2 fps between avg speeds, SD and ES were the same. Easy enough. Is the price of the Labradar worth it? Not in my opinion.
Also to be noted, the MagnetoSpeed V3 does produce a point of impact shift of half an inch at 100 m with my setup and handloaded ammo.
PS: This is not a scientific test, simply comparing both velocity readers from a user point if view.
Bullet tested: 130 gr Norma Golden Target, H4350, CCIBR2, Hornady brass. 2840 fps and a 6.1 SD for 10 shot string.
Rifle: Rem700 5R GII 6.5 Creedmoor, Bushnell 3.5-21x50 DMRII, Nightforce rings and base, Harris bipod and HS Precision stock (bedded).
Hope this helps.
Last edited:




























its a Shotty Gun
RJ





















