700 bolt with no initial extraction cam

Someone previously true the lugs on the bolt/action and get carried away?

No..........

This is certainly a possibility and gets my vote....it would be nice to know the history of the firearm and if it is the product of DIY or a Factory QC issue.

Asked and answered.

Dressing the engaging surfaces of the locking lugs and receiver abutments would set the bolt back a little or a lot depending on how much metal was removed. This would increase headspace and reduce the amount of extraction camming action.
But that is not the case here.
 
Be patient guys... I will post as I go...

First step is to clean the bump that was left on the action camming area that caused the dent in the bolt camming area.

This has been filed and then polished with 400 grit wet/dry paper and lightly buffed. It is now smoother than it looks.

cam.jpg


Next step will be removing the handle.
 
You can usually see a mark on the camming surface of the bolt handle that is made by primary extraction if there is some. Overtime, the camming surfaces can become worn and limit the primary extraction. Of all the Model 700's I have had, all have had some primary extraction, but some more than others.
 
Moving the bolt handle ahead and counterclockwise is, of course, the cure but it is a bit of a chore. In addition, the handles themselves are often a bit off. I have moved the handles and have also made a roller which contacted the receiver. This wasn't my idea but a copy of one which Mick McPhee had done. I have seen a lot of 700's with this flaw in recent years. There is absolutely no excuse for the manufacturer not to have caught this.
 
Here is a rifle I assembled from assorted parts. Receiver is one salvaged from my days in the North, barrel is from JC in Bouctouche NB. .308.
Bolt is a PT&G body, with Holland pattern handle silver brazed in place.
In this photo, the lugs are just about to disengage. Note how much cam engagement there is going to be.
003.jpg
While the scope is mounted higher than necessary (objective is about 7/16" above barrel) you can see how much clearance there is, and how much lower the ocular could be if desired. Scope is a 6.5-20x50 Leupold.
004.jpg
Here is a view showing the Holland handle. Long shank for good leverage; decent sized knob without being a tackiekewl monster. Excellent clearance between the hand and ocular when working the bolt. Wanted to try a MagPul stock. This one was on sale. Plastic and metal magazines work well. Comfortable to shoot. Boringly sub-minute.
005.jpg
Incidentally, of the 788 and 700 handles I've attached using the Brownells silver solder/flux paste, I've never had one detach. There are those who speak highly of TIG for attaching these handles. I know nothing about TIG, haven't used it, not likely to ever use it. But I do have oxy-acetylene, and have confidence in what I can do with it.
 

Attachments

  • 003.jpg
    003.jpg
    44.5 KB · Views: 311
  • 004.jpg
    004.jpg
    52.7 KB · Views: 312
  • 005.jpg
    005.jpg
    82.3 KB · Views: 312
Last edited:
I cleaned up the surfaces of the silver solder that was left... dicked around a bit... had to grind off the front side of the handle so it would allow more movement ahead... I too have never had a silver soldered one break loose. I'll stick with it.

This is how much engagement I should end up with.
Held in place with altered Vice Grips

just touching the cam...
new-cam-1.jpg


after camming back...
new-cam-2.jpg


I would like more... I may adjust it more before soldering...
 
If you are the original owner that might be an option but at this stage it isn't worth the effort.

Are you saying Remington will not take action?

It is in the interest of the client to get Remington to pay for the repair rather than be out of pocket themselves. This is not caused by hot hand loaded ammo or someone bubba-ing the gun; this is a manufacturing defect that was present on the day the rifle left the factory and therefore should be Remington's problem to fix regardless of who or when the rifle was purchased.
 
Remington isn't going to pay for the repair. From a liability standpoint, they aren't going to touch a repair that is outside their control. Remediation at an authorized depot would be the only option if Remington is involved. Generally manufacturers are really hinky about replacing/exchanging bolts. Unless they do the installation, they aren't going to get involved.
 
The soldering came out a solid as could be. I used sheet silver solder and it flowed out evenly, everywhere.

solder-joint.jpg


Didn't slip and the cocking area on the bolt is still hard so I don't need to re heat treat that area.

Just need to clean up a bit. Lots of extraction now...
 
Here is one I am repairing for a friend. Custom single shot precision rifle action made in 1998. Handle failed in 2019. Currently in 7mmWSM, load was a bit warm, extraction was a bit hard, handle separated. To get the bolt body out, I had to pull the barrel. Remington type, but not a Remington bolt. Over the years, a lot of rounds were fired.
action 002.jpg
Note that the silver solder covers less than half the saddle. Amazing it held as long as it did.
action 003.jpg
Receiver is composite. Aluminum body, with steel inserts at the front for the barrel threads and locking abutments, and a steel insert for extraction camming.
action 005.jpg
action 004.jpg
Cone nosed bolt.
action 007.jpg
The action.
action 001.jpg
 

Attachments

  • action 002.jpg
    action 002.jpg
    64.4 KB · Views: 308
  • action 003.jpg
    action 003.jpg
    71.6 KB · Views: 307
  • action 005.jpg
    action 005.jpg
    50.1 KB · Views: 303
  • action 004.jpg
    action 004.jpg
    55.9 KB · Views: 304
  • action 007.jpg
    action 007.jpg
    49.7 KB · Views: 300
  • action 001.jpg
    action 001.jpg
    88.7 KB · Views: 301
Nice work guys.

I've never used "sheet" type silver solder. Never heard of it until now.

I just coat the bottom of the handle with silver solder and heat up the bolt body in the appropriate place, until it flows out all around. Works well, I'm still using one of the rifles and have rebarreled it twice when the throats were pushed to far forward from shooting.

I don't do enough of that type of work. I don't avoid it, just don't get the opportunity. Not that I'm complaining.

Again, very nice work guys.
 
The photos in this thread are amazing!
Also the workmanship is top notch. Well done.
I had no idea how much work is entailed when someone said they have had this done.
Thanks for sharing!
 
Nice work guys.

I've never used "sheet" type silver solder. Never heard of it until now.

I have had a 'roll' of it since 1970... it started out about 10 feet long and is an inch across and about 7 thou thick. I have 6 feet of it left. A little goes a long way.
 
I have had a 'roll' of it since 1970... it started out about 10 feet long and is an inch across and about 7 thou thick. I have 6 feet of it left. A little goes a long way.

Thanks for the great pictures. Gonna steal the idea for the ground out locking pliers jaws too! :)

Any jewellery supply house should be able to supply sheet solders, used a lot for work on that sort of scale. I still have a few pieces of gold sheet solder around.
Another option, if you really want the stuff, is to have the solder wire run through a goldsmiths roller mill.
Given the state of tech these days, it might even be worth inquiring direct through the solder manufacturers, there is a lot of induction heated soldering going on that uses both sheet and powder solders mixed in a flux paste.
 
Good job on the bolt soldering. Had one bolt a 788 let go back in 73, had Al Peterson resolder it. I learned to work with silver solder but haven't done any for a while.
 
Back
Top Bottom