You're just begging me to ask aren't you LOL. Can you elaborate on these scenarios?
I'll defer you to an expert on the subject...
[
You're just begging me to ask aren't you LOL. Can you elaborate on these scenarios?
I'll defer you to an expert on the subject...
[
Look man. The situation you brought up, where there's multiple of you with multiple pistols and rifles, probably in body armour, knowing that the road rage guy likely doesn't have anything on him, on the road, with open spaces and clear view. And most of you already have time to get sights on the guy looking out for any sudden moves.
I'm not discounting your experience in any way, I'm questioning if it translates the same in a HD situation, where there's 1 of you, and who knows how many of them, and a ton more stress.
I'm not convinced it's the same.
Why on earth would anyone with experience like that bother to share anything like what you just asked in a thread like this? It’s clear to everyone reading this train wreck that you are a keyboard warrior with hours and hours of Middle East combat footage watching under your belt who has no desire to really learn anything.
Plinking lots qualifiers you to pontificate on gun fighting as much as it qualifies you to preform heart surgery. Hes not wrong
Shawn
I'm no Mil/LE and have no access to facilities, unfortunately thats the very best I can do as a civilian.
No its not, the best you can do is not talk out your a** about subjects you have no clue about. And then proceed to tell those that have done it for real, that they are wrong and you know better from your vast plininkg experience
Shawn
I'm no professional...
Well if you have seen it, you can say something like "it was found that 80% use their sights at X distances" or "50% of people aim and miss" that level of detail without revealing anonymous persons right? So could you tell us more about these studies, investigations and interviews?
There have been a lot of studies, investigations, and interviews regarding pre and post shooting incidents. But I’m not going to share it on a civilian oriented site with some anonymous person.
Why on earth would anyone with experience like that bother to share anything like what you just asked in a thread like this? It’s clear to everyone reading this train wreck that you are a keyboard warrior with hours and hours of Middle East combat footage watching under your belt who has no desire to really learn anything.
No its not, the best you can do is not talk out your a** about subjects you have no clue about.
Shawn
Do your own damn research because it’s pretty clear you’re only talking out of your a$$.
By the lack of actual content and input from some of these posts, I wonder what kind of response I would get with a more academically orientated approach. Let's try:
"Closer than that, at distances where most gunfights occur, trying to use your sights may take too long; by the time you're sighted in, your target may have moved. At less than 20 feet, you're probably best to fix your gaze on your target and quickly drive your gun up to align with that line of view, firing unsighted." - The Force Science Institute (FSI) Executive Director Bill Lewinski, PhD, doctorate in police psychology
https://www.policeone.com/officer-s...e-your-sights-in-a-gunfight-MCivXtc56uyV18la/
"In most cases, the time to take an aimed shot will not be available...."
"The light necessary to see and use the sights (if the time were available), is not always sufficient"
"... The instinctive-pointing technique of combat firing is the best all-around method of shooting the hand gun without the aid of sights"
Fleet Marine Force Reference Publication FM12-80: Kill or Get Killed. p. 296.
https://archive.org/details/milmanual-fmfrp-12-80-kill-or-get-killed/page/n9/mode/2up
Rebuttal is welcomed, but please do it in a more intelligent way.
(Reads: Include your references and don't pull it out of your a$$)
PinaKaleada said:And get tritium and light on that pistol as well.
PinaKaleada said:Tip: Use light beam to aim. In real life situation no one aims with the sights.
PinaKaleada said:What I'm more surprised is no one has yet to share their combat experience and the psychological state involved.
Looks like you opened with use your Sights...
Maybe they don't want to think about what they've done. Many of them have Nightmares to that effect. They don't need some Tool like you asking them to replay that in their head to support your full on stupid argument.
From “How to impress others with a big bucket of spent brass and stories you’ve gathered from the internet” by F. Tolhurst and K. S. Whetter, 2018, Arthuriana 28(3), p. 51. Copyright 2018 by Scriptorum Press. Reprinted with permission.
So..... I've got NYPD
Marines
and a PhD in Police Psychology
Let's see what you guys have, but please do it in a more intelligent way.
(Reads: Back up your claims with references. Don't pull it out of your a$$)



























