Are any Semi Auto shotties banned?

Last edited:
merlin1 said:
Again,they are not.Again ill come back here tomorrow to see what you got to say then.cheers and goodnight
Click to expand...

So just to be 100% clear....you are saying that a screenshot of the actual FRT saying "prohibited" next to the "bolt action" and "pump action" descriptions is somehow innacurate?

You should really click on the link. This is not about 870 nor 590.

Bolt action Adler - prohib FRT
Pump action Canuck - prohib FRT.

And thats actual FRT, not some search result for prohib shotguns that accidentally captures prohib configurations of NR shotguns.
 
Right- but those two were banned based on the AR15 variant. I don’t agree with it, and I think it’s easy to prove in court- but Remy 870’s and Mossy 590 pumps, as he stated, are NOT prohibited.
 
Paul_1982 said:
Right- but those two were banned based on the AR15 variant. I don’t agree with it, and I think it’s easy to prove in court- but Remy 870’s and Mossy 590 pumps, as he stated, are NOT prohibited.
Click to expand...

I didnt say they were. Maybe others, but not me. Merlin1 says Im wrong about adler and canuck. Or maybe he'll have to admit he didnt bother clicking on the link before replying...which is no better than posting a misleading search result.
 
So, when I google "Derya VR90" I get images for the MK10 and MK12 Are those sub model variations of the VR90? Are the MK10 and MK12 just different editions of the VR90 and thus banned under the updated FRT as AR variants?
 
sailor723 said:
So, when I google "Derya VR90" I get images for the MK10 and MK12 Are those sub model variations of the VR90? Are the MK10 and MK12 just different editions of the VR90 and thus banned under the updated FRT as AR variants?
Click to expand...

If the Derya VR90 is really now banned, my guess is that the MK 10 and MK 12 are also banned being variants of the VR90 ... And this really sucks...!
 
Big-boss-man said:
yes they can and they did. The word is "variant" what does that mean? what ever they want it to.
Click to expand...

Well, they do whatever they want now to suit their agenda. But what WAS NOT a variant by their own standards yesterday IS NOT going to be one today.

The whole issue of tertiary variant prohibitions is just another distraction to hide government's and rcmp's recent shortfalls. Unfortunately, it will most likely take a court case/challenge to rescind those prohibitions.
 
mistero said:
Well, they do whatever they want now to suit their agenda. But what WAS NOT a variant by their own standards yesterday IS NOT going to be one today.

The whole issue of tertiary variant prohibitions is just another distraction to hide government's and rcmp's recent shortfalls. Unfortunately, it will most likely take a court case/challenge to rescind those prohibitions.
Click to expand...


Sure it is. All they have to do is change their standards. They make up the rules as they go along. Variant means whatever they decide it means.

I have very little faith that even if we won a court challenge it would do any good. The Libs would just rewrite the law or maybe use the notwithstanding clause if they lost on a Charter issue. There is only one cure for this and that is a defeated Liberal government after the next election. Not sure that is all that likely but it is our only hope
 
mistero said:
Well, they do whatever they want now to suit their agenda. But what WAS NOT a variant by their own standards yesterday IS NOT going to be one today.

The whole issue of tertiary variant prohibitions is just another distraction to hide government's and rcmp's recent shortfalls. Unfortunately, it will most likely take a court case/challenge to rescind those prohibitions.
Click to expand...

I believe that reality is closer to this

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom