Picture of the day

This problem helped bush the British toward the HMS Dreadnought type battle ship with a single large caliber guns.

The use of these 9.2" weapons on the Lord Nelson class proved a mixed blessing. Although the larger projectile could theoretically cause great damage to lightly protected areas, in practice it proved difficult to distinguish between shell splashes from these 9.2" guns and those made by her 12" (30.5 cm) main guns.

http://www.navweaps.com/Weapons/WNBR_92-50_mk11.php
 
mk23.jpg


The Mark 23 was a further development of the Army's Mk-9 & Mk-19 280mm artillery shell. This was a 15-20 kiloton nuclear warhead adapted to a 16 in naval shell used on the 4 Iowa Class Battleships. While the USN had capable aircraft and missiles to use in the delivery of nuclear weapons, their thought was that the Mk 23/Mark 7 16in/50caliber cannon combination was extremely accurate and usable in any weather condition compared to early jet aircraft and missile technology. 50 weapons were produced starting in 1956 but shortly after their introduction the four Iowa's were mothballed. The weapon stayed in the nuclear inventory until October 1962. There is no known case of the weapon ever being deployed to an operational battleship.

Specifications
L: 5.3ft, W: 1,900lbs,

Performance
Range: Based on 23 mile range of a 2,700lb shell
Yield: 15-20 Kilotons.

This in theory would give each Iowa class Battleship capable of delivering 135-180 kilotons worth of explosives in one salvo. An unique capability that would have proved decisive in any conflict on sea or on land. The nuclear tests with the Mk-9 (11in Army shell) had the shell detonated as an aerial burst. The nuclear tests at the ABLE detonation showed an air burst detonation did little structural damage to battleships. It is unknown from the material I have read if the Mk-23 was designed to detonate on impact or under water which would most likely cause an explosion much like the BAKER nuclear test that caused considerably more damaged to the test fleet. Even with a single air burst detonation a Mk 23, it would have damaged or destroyed much of the enemy battleship fragile equipment it would need to fight if they survived the explosion. Thus leaving for any of the Iowa's easy pickings with their conventional 16in shells.
 
120215930-3575873349130679-367622689028299648-n.jpg


"
Pedro Castanheira badge icon
Tribute to the dead?

Manuel Ribeiro de Faria
That's it... It's traditional, in the Commandos, to put a rifle with the bayonet quietly on the ground, with the beret then placed in the gun frame...

Alegria Faustino badge icon
The black scarf and black ribbon on the beret symbolizes respect for fallen comrades. The second beret, depending on the instruction center, already has the definitive command(officer) emblem.

Miguel Barbosa badge icon
Author
Caro Manuel, exactamente.

120236024-3577520822299265-2867691877102771796-n.jpg


120304585-1699557640197639-3369907623309073943-o.jpg
 
Last edited:
120241815-3780136105339064-7740414314663154868-o.jpg

HMS-Saga.jpg


HMS Saga was a S-class submarine of the third batch built for the Royal Navy during World War II. She survived the war and was sold to Portugal.
Name: HMS Saga
Ordered: 7 April 1943
Builder: Cammell Laird & Co Limited, Birkenhead
Laid down: 5 April 1944
Launched: 14 March 1945
Commissioned: 14 June 1945
Fate: Sold to the Portuguese Navy in 11 October 1948, and renamed NRP Náutilo

Name: NRP Náutilo
Acquired: 11 October 1948
Fate: Placed on disposal list in 1969
 
The smaller British subs of WWII excelled in being able to get into places other subs such as the relatively huge USN fleet boats (Balao, Gato, & Tench class) could not. RN submariners of WWII were not second banana to any other submariners. Where was I reading that one of the RN subs sent to bolster the USN sub squadrons in the Pacific were so bored on patrol the skipper ordered to set a course to a specific shoal as he wanted to see if he could jump the shoal at speed. They managed it with little to no damage. Can you imagine? Balls of iron. I read this in Blatchford's book.

HMS Telemachus, a T class boat. This class was more on par with the big USN boats.

800px-HMS_Telemachus_in_Australia.jpg


An alleged pic of Lai Teck one time leader of the MPAJA (Malayan People's Anti Japanese Army) who collaborated with the Kempetai. He helped the Japanese set up an ambush of a meeting of the MPAJA resulting in the massacre of all the MPAJA key leaders. The new leader of the MPAJA is said to have placed a bounty on Lai Teck. It is rumoured he was choked to death by a hit squad in 1947 after which his remains were dumped in a river in (?) Thailand in 1947.

Who knows for sure though?

lai-teck-feat-900x469.jpg


There is some uncertainty as to the true identity of this guy although it is thought he was a Vietnamese citizen.
more reading:
https://cilisos.my/the-malayan-trip...r-the-british-japanese-french-and-communists/
 
Last edited:
mk23.jpg


The Mark 23 was a further development of the Army's Mk-9 & Mk-19 280mm artillery shell. This was a 15-20 kiloton nuclear warhead adapted to a 16 in naval shell used on the 4 Iowa Class Battleships. While the USN had capable aircraft and missiles to use in the delivery of nuclear weapons, their thought was that the Mk 23/Mark 7 16in/50caliber cannon combination was extremely accurate and usable in any weather condition compared to early jet aircraft and missile technology. 50 weapons were produced starting in 1956 but shortly after their introduction the four Iowa's were mothballed. The weapon stayed in the nuclear inventory until October 1962. There is no known case of the weapon ever being deployed to an operational battleship.

Specifications
L: 5.3ft, W: 1,900lbs,

Performance
Range: Based on 23 mile range of a 2,700lb shell
Yield: 15-20 Kilotons.

This in theory would give each Iowa class Battleship capable of delivering 135-180 kilotons worth of explosives in one salvo. An unique capability that would have proved decisive in any conflict on sea or on land. The nuclear tests with the Mk-9 (11in Army shell) had the shell detonated as an aerial burst. The nuclear tests at the ABLE detonation showed an air burst detonation did little structural damage to battleships. It is unknown from the material I have read if the Mk-23 was designed to detonate on impact or under water which would most likely cause an explosion much like the BAKER nuclear test that caused considerably more damaged to the test fleet. Even with a single air burst detonation a Mk 23, it would have damaged or destroyed much of the enemy battleship fragile equipment it would need to fight if they survived the explosion. Thus leaving for any of the Iowa's easy pickings with their conventional 16in shells.

I wonder if these were subject to the same problem of seawater moderation. the pilots carrying the little boy bombs were instructed to crash over land rather than water because the seawater would cause a potential fizzle in the bomb even if it was undamaged by the crash. having nukes that are too sensitive to being submerged in seawater is not a good idea on a warship
 
Start with a plane possessing inferior performance to its intended enemy counterpart. Then hang great dirty draggy floats on it. And you have the F4F-3S Wildcatfish.

F4F-3S_Wildcatfish_NAN12-70.jpg


f4f3swildcatfish_01.jpg


Grumman-F4F-3S-Wildcatfish-on-Floats-profile-photo-series-03.jpg


Conceived, built, tested, found wanting (shocker!) and finally abandoned. File under "seemed a good idea at the time"...

Grumman-F4F-3S-Wildcatfish-takes-off-near-NAS-Norfolk-1943-01.jpg
 
sir9SDM.jpg


A Fighter Station of the RAF in England during an air battle in which the intrepid pilots of RCAF Hurricanes and Spitfires, aided by the ground defences, destroyed no fewer than 180 Nazi aircraft of all types in a single day. [In this photo] Hurricanes come in to refuel and re-ammunition during the great air battle.

Unrealistic expectations: The Luftwaffe’s doomed mission during the Battle of Britain - Part I

Ic5V2Hk.jpg


An undated photograph of the goal of every Allied airman: a downed enemy aircraft in southern England.

Unrealistic expectations: The Luftwaffe’s doomed mission during the Battle of Britain – Part II

yzeBblo.jpg


During the Battle of Britain, Norma Zelia Watts was the ground contact for the aircrew that fought back the German Luftwaffe in the British skies. Later in the war, she first served with Fighter Command, and then with Bomber Command which is where she met her husband, Flight Lieutenant Jack Vincent Watts, a Royal Canadian Air Force navigator.

Unrealistic expectations: The Luftwaffe’s doomed mission during the Battle of Britain - Part III
 
Interesting .... my mother was a WAAF and transferred to Biggin Hill just after an attack in mid Aug, 1940 ..... Biggin Hill controlled many of the fighters during the Battle of Britain
 
Nice picture.

Lose the floats, lower the wing attachment to the fuselage and you get the Kawanishi N1K2-J Shiden Kai.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kawanishi_N1K

The Shiden Kai possessed heavy armament as well as surprisingly good maneuverability, due to a mercury switch that automatically extended the flaps during turns. These "combat" flaps created more lift, thereby allowing tighter turns. Unlike the Mitsubishi A6M Zero, the Shiden Kai could compete against the best late-war Allied fighters, such as the F6F Hellcat, F4U Corsair, and P-51 Mustang.[7]
 
120601715-10158135649082631-8290390782507397725-n.jpg
[/IMG]

Ottoman battleship Sultan Osman I during construction in Newcastle. Although paid to the last penny, was seized by British government for the Royal navy at the beginning of WW1 and renamed ‘Agincourt’.
Seized, according to Massie, while the Ottoman crew sent to sail her watched from right across the river. She was placed under armed guard to ensure the would-be crew didn’t row over in the night!
 
Back
Top Bottom