you may need a new barrel
It shoots 2MOA with Federal Bulk 55gr FMJ, I'm happy with it. Once it reaches 3.5MOA I'll swap it out.
you may need a new barrel
you may need a new barrel
Good to know...just curious when you bought your WK?
I have asked Kodiak about whether they can provide a list of any improvements implemented, parts that have been improved quality and durability wise. Haven't heard anything. That would be useful, but I guess their position may be they don't want to produce that type of list as it may unnecessarily cause anxiety amongst early owners, who may not have yet had a problem with the gun.
I went shooting with this yesterday and it was a hoot. I did meet another gun owner who helped me get my car stuck out of the mud (long story) and he owned a WK and shared with me that his charging handle broke off as well.
Curious how many of these have to take place before Kodiak will consider sending a new bolt that has the magnetic handle. I imagine you cannot just ask for this retrofit upon request.
I bought my WK Autumn 2019.
I can only commend Kodiak for the customer service they provided me with. I tried to be the best customer possible (if that makes sense) by making sure to take clear well lit detailed pictures of any issue that occurred and being polite (especially over the phone). There was nothing but a strong desire to resolve any issue from Kodiak.
I suspect that Kodiak has to tread carefully with any changes they make to their rifle. This is purely my own belief and is not based on any factual knowledge but it seems extremely convenient that Wolverine & Kodiak separated and then all of a sudden all the improvements such as the steel rails, improved cocking handle and easier to remove rail + gas system suddenly appear at Wolverine's end. I doubt that after circa two years of making the rifle together that all those changes were only thought of immediately after the separation. But it would leave Kodiak in the position where if they make any of the changes which they may well have had input in creating in the first place then they'd be seen as "copying".
I imagine they are working on resolving any remaining issues or meeting market demand but are being careful to test any changes in great detail before releasing them to the market.
It shoots 2MOA with Federal Bulk 55gr FMJ, I'm happy with it. Once it reaches 3.5MOA I'll swap it out.
A .223 barrel with 10,000 rounds through it that holds 2moa with bulk pack fmj ammunition is absolutely outstanding.
True North Arms has been doing a good job providing WK accessories and parts. Perhaps they could stock a bolt control group for purchase that uses the magnetic charging handle; that way people who want to try it could go through at TNA without taking up Kodiak's time.
That does sound good but they'd need to address the wear that the magenetic handle causes. It has no functional impact on the firearm but can surprise people.
Can you break it apart and post some pictures?
Thank you Sir!
![]()
Good to hear! I have one WS-MCR at over 5000 rounds, one at 3000 and just picked up a third that I haven’t decided what to do with yet.
Haven’t cleaned any of them yet, I want to see what happens. They sure don’t get dirty like a DI AR does though!
You know what from the pictures the wear on the receiver is not bad at all.
could a person just go to the "BOLT Shop" and get a grade 8 bolt and use it for a charging Handle. ?
You could file down "round" the head of the bolt and make something durable and useable...............?
The WS-MCR has a steel insert in the receiver where the cocking handle rides to prevent wear on the aluminum upper.I think you guys just convinced me to by a WK180.
Is there any benefit of the WS-MCR over the WK180?



























