OK, You asked for it ... What are the most overrated RIFLE cartridges?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Qf02S4K.jpg


18.7" might not be short enough to be in same class as the x39 but its as close as I have
 
A couple friends own the 16.1" I've just done load dev for them. Mine is 18.7"

Yes factory Federal Premium 180gr Nosler Partition ^

So nobody shots factory ammo in a Short 308, it needs load development to not be an expensive SKS equivalent.
 
It doesn't take a lot of energy to kill a deer.
Economy of force is admirable IMO.

same as archery or handgun or muzzleloader harvest........

Not the same as archery... archery equipmemt is not designed to impart force, it is designed to retain force and cause hemorrhage... not the same physics.
 
Not the same as archery... archery equipmemt is not designed to impart force, it is designed to retain force and cause hemorrhage... not the same physics.

non archer are always making the same mystake ... that was the same done by an ex biologist in the yukon trying to explain to the crowd that an arrow will not break the bones of a bison as needed to harvest one ... when we tried to change the law ... lol
 
Not the same as archery... archery equipmemt is not designed to impart force, it is designed to retain force and cause hemorrhage... not the same physics.

I has not implying arrows impart hydrostatic force of any kind sir.

Penetration energy. Whether the broadhead hits flesh or bone.
You seem to be seeking an argument that will not exist.
Have a great day.
 
7.62x39 (123gr PSP @ 2465 fps, loaded to SAAMI max PSI) vs 16.1" 308 (150gr factory Rem Core Lokt @ 2496 fps)

7.62x39 123gr PSP @ 2464 fps
BC .275
100y +2" , 2180 fps, 1296 ft lbs energy
200y -1.6" , 1913 fps, 999 ft lbs
300y -15", 1670 fps, 761 ft lbs
400y -41" , 1451 fps, 575 ft lbs
500y -83" , 1267 fps, 438 ft lbs

308 Win 150gr Rem CL @ 2496 fps
BC .314
100y +2" , 2243 fps, 1676 ft lbs
200y -1.2" , 2006 fps, 1340 ft lbs
300y -13" , 1784 fps, 1059 ft lbs
400y -36" , 1580 fps, 831 ft lbs
500y -73" , 1398 fps, 651 ft lbs

Hardly apples to apples, as the 308 as loaded above, is about 15% below SAAMI max pressure. As you can see, even with the bluntest shape soft point, the 308 still has a noticeable ballistic advantage over an optimized 7.62x39 load

Code:
Cartridge          : .[B]308 Win[/B]. (SAAMI)
Bullet             : .308, [B]150, Remington PSP CoreLokt[/B]
Useable Case Capaci: 50.180 grain H2O = 3.258 cm³
Cartridge O.A.L. L6: 2.770 inch = 70.36 mm
Barrel Length      : [B]16.1 inch[/B] = 408.9 mm

Predicted Data for Indicated Charges of the Following Powders.
[B]Matching Muzzle Velocity: 2496 fps[/B] or 760 m/s
These calculations refer to your specified settings in QuickLOAD 'Cartridge Dimensions' window.
C A U T I O N : any load listed can result in a powder charge that falls below minimum suggested
loads or exceeds maximum suggested loads as presented in current handloading manuals. Understand
that all of the listed powders can be unsuitable for the given combination of cartridge, bullet
and gun. Actual load order can vary, depending upon lot-to-lot powder and component variations.
USE ONLY FOR COMPARISON !

40 loads produced a Loading Ratio below user-defined minimum of 80%. These powders have been skipped.
Powder type          Filling/Loading Ratio  Charge    Charge   Vel. Prop.Burnt P max  P muzz  B_Time
                                      %     Grains    Gramm   fps     %       psi     psi    ms
---------------------------------  -----------------------------------------------------------------
Hodgdon H4895                       92.0     42.6     2.76    2496    95.2    52435   11499   0.902
IMR 8208 XBR                        91.5     42.3     2.74    2496    96.4    53768   11110   0.892  
IMR 4895                            94.1     43.5     2.82    2496    94.1    51369   11738   0.906
IMR 3031                            93.7     40.5     2.63    2496    99.3    49890   11145   0.911
Alliant AR-Comp                     89.6     40.1     2.60    2496   100.0    50572   10346   0.907
Alliant Reloder-15                  95.4     44.1     2.86    2496    93.5    52079   11650   0.902
IMR 4064                            99.8     43.6     2.83    2496    94.3    54204   11175   0.887  
Hodgdon VARGET                      98.9     44.3     2.87    2496    93.8    54022   11245   0.885  
Hodgdon H322                        88.7     39.8     2.58    2496    99.2    52734   10802   0.896  
Ramshot TAC                         92.0     45.9     2.97    2496    91.6    54894   11339   0.886  
Hodgdon H335                        83.9     42.3     2.74    2496    98.4    52798   11040   0.898  
Hodgdon Benchmark                   91.8     41.8     2.71    2496    97.5    55589   10783   0.886  
Hodgdon CFE223                      89.0     45.9     2.97    2496    94.1    50131   11690   0.901
 
The 308 vs M43 argument has become circular and extremely boring. How many back-n-forth posts between you two on this?
Kinda hoping for Gatehouse to bring 375 H & H to the table just change the topic.
React poorly to this input and extremely caustically as well, I'll be OK... but for god's sake...let it die...please
 
7.62x39 (123gr PSP @ 2465 fps, loaded to SAAMI max PSI) vs 16.1" 308 (150gr factory Rem Core Lokt @ 2496 fps)

7.62x39 123gr PSP @ 2464 fps
BC .275
100y +2" , 2180 fps, 1296 ft lbs energy
200y -1.6" , 1913 fps, 999 ft lbs
300y -15", 1670 fps, 761 ft lbs
400y -41" , 1451 fps, 575 ft lbs
500y -83" , 1267 fps, 438 ft lbs

308 Win 150gr Rem CL @ 2496 fps
BC .314
100y +2" , 2243 fps, 1676 ft lbs
200y -1.2" , 2006 fps, 1340 ft lbs
300y -13" , 1784 fps, 1059 ft lbs
400y -36" , 1580 fps, 831 ft lbs
500y -73" , 1398 fps, 651 ft lbs

Hardly apples to apples, as the 308 as loaded above, is about 15% below SAAMI max pressure. As you can see, even with the bluntest shape soft point, the 308 still has a noticeable ballistic advantage over an optimized 7.62x39 load

Code:
Cartridge          : .[B]308 Win[/B]. (SAAMI)
Bullet             : .308, [B]150, Remington PSP CoreLokt[/B]
Useable Case Capaci: 50.180 grain H2O = 3.258 cm³
Cartridge O.A.L. L6: 2.770 inch = 70.36 mm
Barrel Length      : [B]16.1 inch[/B] = 408.9 mm

Predicted Data for Indicated Charges of the Following Powders.
[B]Matching Muzzle Velocity: 2496 fps[/B] or 760 m/s
These calculations refer to your specified settings in QuickLOAD 'Cartridge Dimensions' window.
C A U T I O N : any load listed can result in a powder charge that falls below minimum suggested
loads or exceeds maximum suggested loads as presented in current handloading manuals. Understand
that all of the listed powders can be unsuitable for the given combination of cartridge, bullet
and gun. Actual load order can vary, depending upon lot-to-lot powder and component variations.
USE ONLY FOR COMPARISON !

40 loads produced a Loading Ratio below user-defined minimum of 80%. These powders have been skipped.
Powder type          Filling/Loading Ratio  Charge    Charge   Vel. Prop.Burnt P max  P muzz  B_Time
                                      %     Grains    Gramm   fps     %       psi     psi    ms
---------------------------------  -----------------------------------------------------------------
Hodgdon H4895                       92.0     42.6     2.76    2496    95.2    52435   11499   0.902
IMR 8208 XBR                        91.5     42.3     2.74    2496    96.4    53768   11110   0.892  
IMR 4895                            94.1     43.5     2.82    2496    94.1    51369   11738   0.906
IMR 3031                            93.7     40.5     2.63    2496    99.3    49890   11145   0.911
Alliant AR-Comp                     89.6     40.1     2.60    2496   100.0    50572   10346   0.907
Alliant Reloder-15                  95.4     44.1     2.86    2496    93.5    52079   11650   0.902
IMR 4064                            99.8     43.6     2.83    2496    94.3    54204   11175   0.887  
Hodgdon VARGET                      98.9     44.3     2.87    2496    93.8    54022   11245   0.885  
Hodgdon H322                        88.7     39.8     2.58    2496    99.2    52734   10802   0.896  
Ramshot TAC                         92.0     45.9     2.97    2496    91.6    54894   11339   0.886  
Hodgdon H335                        83.9     42.3     2.74    2496    98.4    52798   11040   0.898  
Hodgdon Benchmark                   91.8     41.8     2.71    2496    97.5    55589   10783   0.886  
Hodgdon CFE223                      89.0     45.9     2.97    2496    94.1    50131   11690   0.901

You know that at 100 yards the Prvi PSP 7.62x39 (not SAAMI and ~2550 fps) from an SKS is within 10 (ten) fps of the Nosler Trophy Grade 150 accubond from the Overrated Shorty 308 and ONE fps of the Remington 150 PSP.

It's fantasy to think the Shorty 308 is in a different class than the SKS.
 
You know that at 100 yards the Prvi PSP 7.62x39 (not SAAMI and ~2550 fps) from an SKS is within 10 (ten) fps of the Nosler Trophy Grade 150 accubond from the Overrated Shorty 308 and ONE fps of the Remington 150 PSP.

It's fantasy to think the Shorty 308 is in a different class than the SKS.


What barrel length for the 308?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom