Why are the new European rifles so heavy? I know that a few always were (e.g. Schultz and Larson) but many more were svelte, light and handy (e.g. Mannlicher-Schoenauer, early Sako and HVA, most Oberndorf Mauser Sporting Carbines.) Lately I had a look at the current Steyr Mannlicher fullstock carbine that is advertised as being an heir to the original M-S Model 1903 (that weighed 6.5 lb.). Even with a short 20 in. barrel, the Steyr-Mannlicher weighs 7.5 lb without a scope or rings. The lightest alloy rings and a compact scope will still add at least 1 lb. to that weight...more likely 1.5 lb. That takes you up to 9 lb. unloaded. And this is their compact carbine. Presumambly their full length rifles are even heavier. Likewise the current Sako Bavarian fullstock. That Sako is heavy and handles like a log. I know stand hunting is overwhelmingly popular in Europe and many European hunters don't have to lug their rifles anywhere, but it is not just carried weight, it is also a matter of handling. Upland game shotgunners and sportbike riders will understand.




















































