Huh? The ARC (advanced rifle cartridge) would fit a Grendel or 7.62x39 527
I have a feeling this is a reference that is going over my head
Slimbo you don’t own a 6.5x55? I thought you would have a 6.5x55 tikka for sure, maybe RJ (TJ) can sell you one
How does the 6mm-08 differ from the 243 Win?
Anyways, the 6mm-284 makes the most sense to me - same case length as the 6.5X55, but larger in diameter. These no Wildcat based on the 6.5X55 that can provide more case capacity.
That's not the dumbest idea I've heard. In fairness though, I've heard a lot of really dumb ideas! Nowadays, even the 6mm Remington is practically a wildcat, so it doesn't make much difference. You pretty well need a proper reamer though. There is nothing worse than having a bunch of brass or a barrel blank looking for a purpose. I've saved myself a lot of money by giving away brass or dies which were tempting me.
I owned one, super cartridge!6.5 Arch was an old wildcat, basically a shortened neck and a blown out 6.5 swede case. Gets very close to 6.5-06 velocities. - dan
As far as I know the 6.5 Arch is an Ackley style improved 6.5x55, there was an article about it in, I want to say, "Canadian Hunting and Shooting" back in the 90's.
As I thought you have NO idea ���� .But I DO have a 6.5x55 AI 40 degree. It’s called a SUPER SWEDE by me
RJ
what speeds do you get with the super Swede?
And what do you have against the 270 TJ?
Have you considered reboring your barrel? .257 or .277
The 270x55 would really be approaching greatness I bet
With a shorter neck, blown out case and 40 degree shoulder it would come close to duplicating the 6.5-284.
What you call yourself a gun nut? Never rebored a barrel blank before?
The 270x55 would really be approaching greatness I bet