Old or New double barrels

MosinMan13

CGN Regular
Rating - 100%
19   0   0
So I have a Mossberg 590 18.5” I bought ages ago, and I’m finally ridding myself of it, not because it’s a bad gun, but I mostly don’t have a use for it. I used to shoot clays with my buddies but it’s not entirely useful for that, and the little bit of grouse I hunt, it’s also overkill for.

If I ever pull a shotgun from the safe anymore, it’s for a quiet small game hike through the back 40, I don’t compete or regularly use them for anything else. I do think old double barrel SXS are functioning art, and I quite enjoyed shooting my buddies grandfathers 12g SXS.

My questions are firstly, are old SXS safe? I’ve searched around but the best I can find suggests I shouldn’t consider anything pre 1940 for poor metal and design. Is there a particular model or any make I should keep my eyes open for?

Secondly does SXS vs O/U make a difference or is it just preference?

And thirdly, am I better off saving up and buying a budget/entry level modern double barrel, or will I be fine sourcing something older?

Thanks I’m advanced, I’ve got a lot of experience with rifles but virtually none with shotguns, I love milsurps so I like the idea of an old SXS if it’s feasible, but I don’t shoot enough to justify anything pricey.
 
You have asked such a generalized question, are pre 1940 SxS safe, that it’s impossible to answer in the same generalized way. I will say that I have owned about 25 pre 1940 SxS, some from the 1880s, and they are essentially all I shoot. And all of them are safe with appropriate ammo.

The real question(s) you want to ask are 1) is this gun safe? 2) How do I tell if a gun is safe? And 3) what ammo can I safely shoot through this gun.
 
Canvasback has summed it up. There are literally thousands of SxS's pre 1940 that are safe to shoot . I also have several that are pre 1940. In fact, many pre 1940 guns are safer than some guns made today. Don't kid yourself, there is junk being built today just as there has been lower quality guns made in every decade from various countries. Your questions can be better answered if you have a couple of specific guns in mind. Just tipping the ice-berg here, many claim that a lot of the Spanish guns throughout the 70's and 80's had soft steel internally. Some older Belgian guns got the nick name JABC (just another Belgian clunker). But, there were also some beautiful Spanish and Belgian guns from the same time periods. Just as a lot of the newer Turkish guns have problems. So the answers really come down to specific guns you may be looking at. But for me I would pick a quality continental gun that can be had a decent prices before I'd look at a new budget gun.
As far as over/under or SxS that is a personal choice to a large degree. Some like the single sight plain of an over/under as opposed to a SxS. Most use an over/under if doing clays shooting. But then you have personal choices within the gun. Do you want straight stock or pistol grip style stock. Double triggers, single selective or single non selective, extractors or ejectors etc. etc. So you have to decide what you want/need. But whatever the gun type, if it doesn't fit you you will have a hard time hitting didly-squat.
 
Last edited:
I have multiple older shotguns dating back to 1870’s which are perfectly safe shoot and get used with correct loads. Damascus doubles that are loaded with black powder and 2.5” shells. A lot of current junk I wouldn’t buy because of low quality. The same can be said of the early stuff. No matter the year your always going to have someone produce cheap junk that won’t last. Better quality stuff lasts a lot longer so I believe in paying a higher price for better quality.
 
If I ever pull a shotgun from the safe anymore, it’s for a quiet small game hike through the back 40, I don’t compete or regularly use them for anything else. I do think old double barrel SXS are functioning art, and I quite enjoyed shooting my buddies grandfathers 12g SXS.

My questions are firstly, are old SXS safe? I’ve searched around but the best I can find suggests I shouldn’t consider anything pre 1940 for poor metal and design. Is there a particular model or any make I should keep my eyes open for?

We agree on the "functioning art" aspect of vintage SxS. So I'll try to list some basics to look for when examining a pre WWII gun. But let me correct an error that you start with. The design of SxS was essentially completed by the 1920s. Nothing of note has happened since in terms of design. The only real development is the quality of the steel used. So poor design existed back then......but also the best designs. What's happened since is the poor designs got abandoned and the good designs became ubiquitous.

First, is it from America or from the UK or Europe? American guns are not "proofed" by a public proofing house. Proofing is test firing of extreme loads to ensure the gun doesn't blow up. So American guns don't have "proof marks" stamped on the barrels. Why is this important? With American guns and law, with the onus on the maker to be sure the gun was safe, American makers tended (not 100%) to build very sturdy (read thick barrels) guns. So if you can look at the barrels, inside and out, and see little or no evidence of corrosion, odds are that the barrels are safe to shoot appropriate ammo.

For makers from across the Atlantic, whose guns must have passed through a public proof house, they were prepared to play it a little tighter with tolerances, ie thinner barrel walls, to get a lighter, more dynamic handling gun. Still safe but just with tighter tolerances.

And so with all of them, American and foreign, if the barrels look good, why does any of this matter? They look good....should be safe, right? The problem is that in their 80 to 150 year history, there is the strong possibility the inside walls have been "honed" to clean up the beginnings of corrosion. Do this a few times and you can easily get to a point where the barrel walls are now no longer strong enough to safely manage the internal pressure generated by firing it. And you can't know if the barrels have been honed, really, without having a qualified vintage SxS smith examine the gun. Not a guy who says he's a smith. Not a rifle smith or a guy who mostly works on handguns......a vintage SxS smith. They are few and far between but if you want to play with vintage SxS, it's worth finding one. The criteria for who to use is not "who is close enough I can drive to" but "who does good work". The upside for you is there are a few very competent sxs smiths on the fringes of the GTA. So not impossible for you.

The second aspect to consider, but intimately related to the above, is what ammo do you intend to use and what ammo is safe for the gun. Can it handle modern ammo needing a 2 3/4" chamber and generating pressure in the 11,000 psi range? Or does it need specialty ammo, designed for 2 1/2" chambers and generating pressures in the 6000 to 8000 psi range? Over the last 120 years of gun and ammo development, steel has been getting better and ammo has been developed to produce higher pressures and faster speeds. The guns of 1910 were never designed for the ammo of today.

And finally, in the fundamentals category, what is the condition of the stock and the impact that the recoil generated by the ammo you use is going to have on it. A couple issues here. The first is that as wood ages, the inletted portion of the stock, where the wood meets the metal, shrinks....pulling away from the metal. This reduces the contact area between the wood and metal, focusing the recoil forces onto an ever decreasing area of wood. Vastly increasing the likelihood of recoil causing the splitting of the wood. The action becomes a wedge being driven into the wood with every shot fired. And as a reminder......what affects recoil? It's simple....just three things......it's specifically the weight of the load ( 1 oz, 1 1/4 oz etc), the speed to which that load is accelerated to as it travels down the barrels and the overall weight of the gun. Nothing else matters.

So if you take a light gun......say 12 gauge 6 1/2 pounds, and you blast 1 1/4 oz loads out it at 1400 fps, not only will you have a sore shoulder, but you will shortly split your stock. On the other hand, take the same gun, shoot 1 oz loads at 1150 fps and both your shoulder and your gun will thank you.

Now, there is tons more I could talk about but it all makes a lot more sense from here to discuss a specific gun you might have in mind.
 
Last edited:
I bought my first fluid steel balled sxs a couple years ago. Uo until then all of my SXS's have been some variation of laminated steel barrels. I shot them all the time, with light loaded (50grains power, equivalent by volume shot) black powder cartridges with no issues. None of my SXS's are high end. They are all run of the mill guns, the kind you can (used to be able to?) pick up cheap. My oldest SXS is a 20ga flint circa 1790 that has whispy thin barrels. I have shot it but not much as it has a WAY too straight stock for me. IMO, if the gun is not off face and the barrels look decent, with the right (light) loads, I have no issues with shooting them. If you use once fired hulls, cut the star crimp off and use black powder and a roll crimper, you don't need to worry about chamber length either.
 
As posted above you can't get a better answer. One thing not touched upon was budget. Saying you may save up for a new entry level would suggest the budget is rather small. That being taken into account there are many good working doubles for sale under $500. Exterior finish may be worn and wood may be scratched and you'll have to settle for fixed chokes but if you're ok with that I'd suggest looking at places like intersurplus or great North guns and similar. Read the discriptions carefully and desire what features and stock shape you prefer. Look into that particular make and model. There's alot of knowledge on this site. If looking for a new gun I'd suggest huglu for a new sxs.
I shoot several older guns some dating back to the 1880s and I also shoot new doubles.
 
My first fluid steel barrelled SXS that I bought a few years ago is a Fox Model B-SE in 12 ga that I picked up at a gun show for <$500. I need something I could shoot smokeless through for clays. It is the only single trigger SXS I have ever owned. It points and shoots great but is heavy. I recently bought a CZ Bobwhite 20GA (Made by Huglu) and, while I have only shot a few rounds at a pattern board so far, am quite pleased with the way it points and handles.
 
I just picked up two, a Q1 Simson ( after combing Intersurplus for weeks) and a Stevens 311 ( off #######). Beautiful old guns, under $300, in great condition,light weight, easy pointing. Far superior materials, quality of fit and finish compared to the cheaper stuff from Turkey and that other place across the water. My 2 cents worth anyway.
 
Interesting.....

A couple guns get mentioned, likely good options for the OP, and there is a relationship between them not that well known.

LTK mentions he got a Fox Model B. The Fox Model B was introduced by Savage (owners of the Fox brand name at that point) in the 1940's to take advantage of the brand name recognition that Fox guns had, but with an opening price point "hardware" store model. It stayed in production until the mid 1980's. Most Fox aficionados don't consider a Fox Model B to be a true Fox gun. Unlike ALL the other Foxes, Sterlingworths up to Grade F, the Model B has a completely different action design.

It has a different action because it is essentially a Steven 311, rebranded. By the time the 311 was introduced in the early 1930s, Stevens was also owned by Savage. So when, a decade later, they wanted a new, inexpensive gun to put the Fox name on, they just reworked the 311 a bit. And the Stevens 311 is the gun Arcosdad bought and enjoys.
 
I hope the OP finds a good double!

Sadly many old guns have been abused, very often the result of using incorrect ammunition that the guns were never made for. Low-cost guns were never intended to last more than a generation, then as now. Guns have been 'shot loose' by running over-powered loads in short chambers, resulting in, amongst other problems, cracked stocks as mentioned above. Add on bubba repairs and general poor maintenance, and you have good reason to be wary of old doubles. All that said, there are many perfectly sound old doubles available well below the cost of a new entry-level Turkish gun. You have to start with a reasonable level of quality and condition (no homemade repairs, tight on the face, clean barrels), and feed it appropriate ammunition. For the OP, buying a flat of low-pressure 2 1/2" cartridges would last a lifetime of "quiet game hikes in the back 40". For that kind of hunting, I prefer an English gun, one that was made by someone who took pride in their work and who had a reputation to keep. It might not get shot much, but is a joy to have in the hands. American doubles can be good value if you know what to look for, but they have never attracted my attention and I can't comment on them.
 
Mauserman, those are some real pearls that have been presented to you. By some very knowledgeable guys. Knowledge gained overy many years while hunting, collecting, shooting, researching, and having guns repaired as needed. Not much I can add here but good luck. Recently I saw a Lefever Nitro Special in 20 gauge for sale. I don't think someone in your shoes would regret buying that as an occasional grouse-getter. Like the Fox, that's not a 'real' Lefever. Some people like a sling - if so one of the continental guns will have swivels already installed. You're not going to go too far wrong here - if it doesn't fit then sell for basically what you paid and get another one.
 
I hunt with older S x S shotguns. All of good quality like ; Parker , Fox , Ithaca,
and Le fever. Correct loads for the gun are very important as shells have increased
in power over the years. Example : My 1927 Parker 12 ga. , when reseached , had a
max. load of 3 1/4 DRAM 1 1/4 oz. .Basically a FIELD Load & not a DUCK load.
Guns before 1935 are often NOT with a standard chamber length.
As such I bought a Brownells Chamber Lenghth Kit. It is a set of tapered round bars
which clearly mark the chamber length. Much better than the cheap flat metal ones.
 
Screenshot_20230112-053717.jpg

This is a Husqvarna 51 that I enjoy hunting with. It has 2.5" chambers and fixed chokes but it's a joy to carry and patterns extremely well. Cost was around $375
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20230112-053717.jpg
    Screenshot_20230112-053717.jpg
    25.7 KB · Views: 137
Wow amazing, I was going to try to reply to a few but every reply has actually been a huge help, I’ve got three models I’m looking at right now, a Janssen Sons and Co, a Stevens 311 and a few Husqvarna models varying in chambering. From what I can tell base on the absolute wealth of knowledge you guys shared with me a Fox would also be a great option. I actually hadn’t considered a lot of great points in here about the weight of the gun or the load of the shot.

I’ll certainly let you guys know how my journey unfolds!
 
Wow amazing, I was going to try to reply to a few but every reply has actually been a huge help, I’ve got three models I’m looking at right now, a Janssen Sons and Co, a Stevens 311 and a few Husqvarna models varying in chambering. From what I can tell base on the absolute wealth of knowledge you guys shared with me a Fox would also be a great option. I actually hadn’t considered a lot of great points in here about the weight of the gun or the load of the shot.

I’ll certainly let you guys know how my journey unfolds!

Of course, condition is very important. However, so is the original quality. I don’t know which Husky model you are considering but I have the highest regard for Husqvarna as a maker. Much more so than some of the other guns mentioned in this thread. I have owned a Husky and regret selling it. They are always on my “watch” list. Just waiting for the right one to pop up.

A Husqvarna 310 is head and shoulders above a Stevens 311, a Fox Model B or a Jassen in original quality.

Edit to add: They also blow the post WWII Sauer/Simpson/ Merkel communist crap out of the water.
 
Last edited:
Of course, condition is very important. However, so is the original quality. I don’t know which Husky model you are considering but I have the highest regard for Husqvarna as a maker. Much more so than some of the other guns mentioned in this thread. I have owned a Husky and regret selling it. They are always on my “watch” list. Just waiting for the right one to pop up.

A Husqvarna 310 is head and shoulders above a Stevens 311, a Fox Model B or a Jassen in original quality.

I couldn't possibly agree more with this assessment.
 
I love old SxS guns!
Cat
gZY77GQ.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom